2 DL Notifications

Tue Apr 15 20:07:17 EDT 2008

Ravi,

 My guess is that you have two deadline jobs running, and that they
occasionally
execute at the same time. Have you already checked SM37 for multiple
RSWWDHEX jobs?

hope this helps
Paul

             "Ravi Dixit"                                                  
             <dolbydix at gmail.c                                             
             om>                                                        To 
             Sent by:                  sap-wug at mit.edu                     
             sap-wug-bounces at m                                          cc 
             it.edu                                                        
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: 2 DL Notifications              
             16/04/2008 09:51                                              
             AM                                                            

             Please respond to                                             
               "SAP Workflow                                               
               Users' Group"                                               
             <sap-wug at mit.edu>                                             

Dear WUGers

Can someone respond to my issue below please? This is happening in our 46C
environment and I was wondering if anyone else came across this before.
You can find the attachment here...Url :
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080415/f2311021/2DLItems.doc

Regards
Ravi

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:11:08 +1000
From: "Ravi Dixit" <dolbydix at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2 DL Notifications
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Message-ID:
       <eb76006c0804142311k4d43b0f6t9daf0ac17191010c at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Shai

The manager receives, the LE one that he is meanto receive. I am not sure
on
the second question but it is not happening always only intermittently.
There is no substitution set up at any of the levels.
In the examples where it has sent 2 notifications, it actually creates two
DL workitems, please see the attached screenshots.

Thanks.

Regards
Ravi

> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: 2 DL Notifications (Ravi Dixit)
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Message-ID: <827081.71727.qm at web59109.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Ravi,
>
> It does sounds like a mystery. Few questions that might lead to the
> problem:
> Looking into the manager worklist you should be able to see which
deadline
> he gets. Is it requested end + latest end ?
> Is this happening to all employees or only few specific ?
> How about substitution - do we have any ? (at employee level off course).
> 10x,
>
>
> Regards,
> Shai Eyal
> SAP Logistics senior consultant
> SAP Workflow specialist
> Mobile: 972-52-5816633
>
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:25:06 +1000
> From: "Ravi Dixit" <dolbydix at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: 2 DL Notifications
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Message-ID:
>    <eb76006c0804131725nb5c9925q1ce0cd937bdcf774 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear Shai
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> You are right about the RE, it should have been RE not RS, my apologies.
>
> It still does not explain the 2 notifications to the manager of approver.
> The set up is Requested End goes to Employee(applicant of Leave), and
> Latest
> End is sent to Manager of approver.
>
> Any input would be much appreciated.
>
> Best Regards
> Ravi Dixit
>
>
>
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: 2 DL Notifications
> > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > Message-ID: <996779.38046.qm at web59115.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Dear Ravi,
> >
> > Request Start means the workitem is created at WAITING status and
> appears
> > in the employee worklist only when Request start is reached. It does
not
> > send notification. Therefore I can guess you refered to Latest Start.
> Now,
> > Latest Start will never happen if the employee starts processing the
> > workitem (which means the status is not READY anymore) even if it does
> not
> > get completed. So this may be the reason. As for the manager receiving
> two
> > notifications - I'd check the Requested End also.
> >
> > Good luck
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shai Eyal
> > SAP Logistics senior consultant
> > SAP Workflow specialist
> > Mobile: 972-52-5816633
> >
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080415/f2311021/attachment.htm

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2 DL Items.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 77824 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080415/f2311021/2DLItems.doc
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

******************************************************************************************************************************************************

Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient of this e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail or any of its attachments.  Opinions contained in this e-mail or any of its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Queensland Treasury.

The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be legally privileged and the subject of copyright.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.  Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software.  However, it is not liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.  

******************************************************************************************************************************************************