[Tango-L] Should automatic crossing, or automatic anything, be discouraged?
Tom Stermitz
stermitz at tango.org
Sun Aug 26 13:51:07 EDT 2007
People keep talking at cross-purposes, but Laurie's coments below
point out that things are different for different people, different
situations, different levels and different styles. What is necessary
for a beginner is insufficient for an intermediate, and doesn't makes
sense for an advanced.
Most teachers tend to analyze things teach at THEIR level rather than
teaching in layers appropriate for the different levels. And, judging
from this list, tango teachers are an analytical, over-educated, over-
verbal bunchh
RULE-LEAD vs AXIS-LEAD CROSS
The "RULE CROSS" (aka after two steps outside...) functions for
beginners, but I find it teaches them to count, and that is harder to
learn than feeling for what signals the cross. For more experienced
people the "RULE" applies in the sense that it is such a common move,
she just comes to expect the cross whenever he goes outside.
Therefore, the not-cross becomes a critical lead.
AXIS:
A far better instruction for beginners is to teach lead for the cross
using a diagonal shift of the axis, which enables the "in-line" cross
and very subtle "right-side crosses" as well as, leading the "not-
cross". A new beginner has the precision to lead and not lead crosses
with great subtlety.
SPIRAL:
I'm very much against using the mans' spiral to lead the cross as I
find this teaches very gross (if not grotesque) movements with the
men over leading and the ladies losing their ability to follow the
axis. For me, the spiral is how the man FOLLOWS the cross, not leads
it. This is a very luscious connection that feels very connected.
However it is an adv-beginner or intermediate skill.
Comparing the "RULE CROSS" with the "FOLLOW HIS AXIS CROSS", I find
that it takes 30 or 40 minutes for new beginners to learn the RULE-
LEAD, and five minutes to learn the AXIS-LEAD. That is 30 minutes
lost where they could be learning rhythm or music or lead-follow.
Also, the AXIS-LEAD is experiential and intuitive, whereas the RULE-
LEAD is mental and analytical.
I do everything possible to keep people moving, in their physical
bodies, and not thinking too much.
I'm in the school of "Lead the cross; Lead the not-cross". This has
the advantage that the ladies are taught to wait on the cusp of the
decision, so the lead-follow can be more subtle. As followers get
better,
NUEVO ANALYSIS
Gustavo and the others of the nuevo school are very analytical
teachers, which is great fun for the teachers in this forum. But, to
use the concept of the giro to explain the cross is useless for a
beginner. They can hardly stand up, let alone learn ochos, and the
giro has to come after ochos.
In any case, depending on the situation, the giro is frequently
distorted, (the cross is sort of a front ocho, theoretically) so only
the curious really care whether the cross is part of the giro, a
structured pattern, or an improvised walk. Yeah, it explains a few
things, but who cares, really beyond Tango-L arguers?
On Aug 26, 2007, at 2:09 AM, lgmoseley at aol.com wrote:
> ...In my view (and I'm from the UK not the USA), the lady should
> never cross
>
> automatically. In fact she should never do anything automatically
> (unless
>
> she has been given the 'over to you signal', or has indicated that she
>
> wishes to do firuletes or something else of her choice).
>
>
> ... On every step, the lady will have no idea what
>
> is going to come next. She has to wait for a lead. That wait is
> commonly
>
> only a fraction of a second, but it is a wait.
>
>
> ...Of course, with a a lady who walks to the beat (unless
> otherwise led)
>
> and does not cross until it is indicated, there are many more
> conversational
>
> and communicative possibilities. I’d happily discuss on another
> occasion the
>
> many possibilities that getting into and out of the cross present,
> but I have
>
> rabbited on long enough for one posting.
>
> Laurie (Laurence)
>
> 24 August 2007
>
More information about the Tango-L
mailing list