WF or Tranx Executed

[Ramki Maley]

That is how it is done in the Engineering Change Workflows by SAP. I 
could be wrong but vaguely remember that there is a standard SAP static 
method that can be called which will tell if current execution is within 
a workflow context.

Regards,
Ramki.


On 7/24/14, 6:33 AM, george_caramaliu at yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Jeff,
> I implemented something similar, maybe it helps:
> - in the BO method called by the needed task we export to memory a flag
> - in the standard transaction an enhancement is implemented to check 
> if the flag is set in memory and either deny execution outside 
> workflow while a workflow is started or just log somewhere the user 
> actions outside wf
> If this can be achieved with standard I would like to know also ?
>
> George Caramaliu
> ABAP/Workflow freelancer
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: * Jeff Rappaport <Jeff at business-workflow.com>;
> *To: * SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>;
> *Subject: * Re: WF or Tranx Executed
> *Sent: * Tue, Jul 22, 2014 7:01:59 PM
>
> Hey Ed,
>    No, I'm not looking to see if a valid Dialog User executed it, I'm 
> looking to see if the valid Agent executed the Tranx through WF 
> (Inbox) or directly through the Tranx. I'm pretty sure I had a way to 
> distinguish it some time ago just can't remember.
>
> Jeffrey A. Rappaport
> Business Workflow Inc.
> Voice: +1 (609) 301-8706
> Fax: +1 (866) 301-7666
> Email: Jeff at Business-Workflow.com
> Web: www.Business-Workflow.com
> Link: www.linkedin.com/in/businessworkflow
>
>
> The information contained in this message may be privileged, 
> confidential and protected from disclosure. If the Reader of this 
> message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error 
> and would like to be removed from any future mailings from this 
> Sender, please hit 'Reply' to this email with "REMOVE" in the Subject 
> line.
>
> *From:* Edward Diehl <javascript:return>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2014 8:12 AM
> *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group <javascript:return>
> *Subject:* RE: WF or Tranx Executed
> Hi Jeff,
> This is what we are using to filter how the workflow starts.
>
> Select single ustyp into initiator_type from usr02
> where bname = wf_initiator+2.
>
> ustyp = A = dialog_user.
>
>
>
>
> *Ed Diehl
> */"Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of 
> enthusiasm."/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Jeff at business-workflow.com
> To: SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> Subject: WF or Tranx Executed
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:59:10 -0400
>
> All,
>    I'm drawing a complete blank since I did it so long ago. I'm trying 
> to tell the difference on whether an FI Tranx was run direct through 
> the Tranx or executed from within the WF calling that Tranx or FM. 
> We're trying to make sure it was executed by only a valid Agent from 
> within the step.
> Thanx,
>
> Jeffrey A. Rappaport
> Business Workflow Inc.
> Voice: +1 (609) 301-8706
> Fax: +1 (866) 301-7666
> Email: Jeff at Business-Workflow.com
> Web: www.Business-Workflow.com
> Link: www.linkedin.com/in/businessworkflow
>
>
> The information contained in this message may be privileged, 
> confidential and protected from disclosure. If the Reader of this 
> message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error 
> and would like to be removed from any future mailings from this 
> Sender, please hit 'Reply' to this email with "REMOVE" in the Subject 
> line.
>
>
> _______________________________________________ SAP-WUG mailing list 
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20140724/58417829/attachment-0001.htm