2 Development Environments

[Sheldon Oxenberg]

Hi Carolyn,

We configure the environments with different prefix numbers and track the
numbers that we have ever used.
Then if we build a new environment, we use a new prefix number that is
different than any that we have ever used.
Alternatively, you would need to determine the last full number used, and
set the number range to be greater than the last full number.
Since you cannot choose the full number in an environment, objects created
in one environment are "transported" to the others.


Regards.

SHELDON OXENBERG
LMP Technical Architect, SAP Workflow
CSC




From:	Carolyn A Fuller <fuller at mit.edu>
To:	"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Cc:	Workflow Administrators <wf-admin at mit.edu>, R3-Admin
            <r3-admin at mit.edu>
Date:	09/13/2012 12:06 PM
Subject:	2 Development Environments
Sent by:	sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu



Hi,

We are beginning our annual system upgrade and have a need to do workflow
development in two separate development environments, one in an upgraded
environment (EHP6 731) and one in our current environment (ECC 6.0 702).
Ultimately, all this development will need to co-exist in consistently
upgraded environments.

We are concerned about colliding workflow object numbers.

One solution would be to configure the two environments with different
workflow and organizational management prefix numbers. Will this cause a
problem when they are transported into  consistently upgraded environments?

---
Carolyn Fuller
Senior Analyst/ Programmer
Information Services and Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Room W92-215A
Cambridge, MA 02139
(617) 253-6213
http://fuller.mit.edu/


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug