SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 22
Bharath Padmanabhan
calltobharath at gmail.com
Thu Sep 22 23:36:35 EDT 2011
Dear Mike,
Thanks a ton for your crystal clear reply.
Also you have provided a useful input to me that WF admin can be maintained
in header level info of workflows.
I totally agree with your option of notifying people and halting WF until
fix is done.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Bharath
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:42 PM, <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21 (Bharath Padmanabhan)
> 2. Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21 (Mike Pokraka)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:21:29 +0530
> From: Bharath Padmanabhan <calltobharath at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Message-ID:
> <CAP+rKFL=wQVuOucQBBqT1JFif7ocQ_q4aeZXxOKOHEzLgL5v1g at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear Ramki,
>
> Thanks a lot for that valuable link. I have shared with my basis guys to
> implement the same.
>
> 1 more small querry - Is it possible to customize the standard text coming
> in the mail to WF admin.
>
> If yes then where and how it can be done. Also if we customize will it be a
> global change in the sense that whatever workflow either
> travel or leave or something else runs into error will the same customized
> content be sent in mail or is it possible to make customization in that
> mail
> content for every workflow. Say 1 mail content for travel workflow & 1 for
> leave workflow - something like that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bharath
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:06 PM, <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> > sap-wug at mit.edu
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. W2 Reprint workflow (Banaga CM (Chris) at Aera)
> > 2. Re: W2 Reprint workflow (Rick Bakker)
> > 3. Auto mail to WF Admin (Bharath Padmanabhan)
> > 4. Re: Auto mail to WF Admin (Ramki Maley)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:08:55 -0700
> > From: "Banaga CM (Chris) at Aera" <CMBanaga at aeraenergy.com>
> > Subject: W2 Reprint workflow
> > To: "sap-wug at mit.edu" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> FB6591B98BB5DB47ADDF77478F7918CF102A1B2EB4 at BKMAIL71.aeraenergy.com
> > >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > We are using the standard SAP workflow WS01000090. After applying
> support
> > packs in development, the step where an email is sent to the user is not
> > happening. It is not showing up as an errored out workflow in SWI2_DIAG,
> > but it is not working the same as it was before the support pack. Does
> > anyone have any clues as to what the problem might be? Any help would be
> > greatly appreciated.
> >
> >
> >
> > Christine Ba?aga
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110921/e1ef484e/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:48:03 +1000
> > From: Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: W2 Reprint workflow
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID:
> > <CAGSLasSf+Vuf04gUr=A-0ToG5n+872TZx8R=
> vbrm0C2Z+PXPEA at mail.gmail.com
> > >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > As always, look in the workflow log (SWI1) to see exactly what
> > happened. Was the step executed? Look in Step History and in the
> > container elements, perhaps an error message was returned.
> >
> > regards
> > Rick Bakker
> > hanabi technology
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Banaga CM (Chris) at Aera
> > <CMBanaga at aeraenergy.com> wrote:
> > > We are using the standard SAP workflow WS01000090.? After applying
> > support
> > > packs in development, the step where an email is sent to the user is
> not
> > > happening.? It is not showing up as an errored out workflow in
> SWI2_DIAG,
> > > but it is not working the same as it was before the support pack.? Does
> > > anyone have any clues as to what the problem might be?? Any help would
> be
> > > greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Christine Ba?aga
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:43:43 +0530
> > From: Bharath Padmanabhan <calltobharath at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Auto mail to WF Admin
> > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> CAP+rKF+azv74LL_gs7OtA2FTMuXk4AgXO65kkNSkWqUKWMgMig at mail.gmail.com
> > >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Dear Team,
> >
> > As we all know if we maintain workflow administrator in SWU3 Tcode a mail
> > will be sent to that user whenever a workflow runs into error.
> >
> > I have 10 clients in PRD. When any workflow runs into error in any
> clients
> > WF admin user is getting mail as expected. But there is no detail about
> the
> > client in which the workflow went to error. Only workitem id is sent in
> > mail. So WF admin has to login to all clients to identify which client
> has
> > the problem.
> >
> > 1) Is it possible to tweak/customize the current standard message sent to
> > WF
> > admin. If yes, then will it be a global mail content change meaning that
> > will the same be sent to all
> > types of workflows? (Say for eg: If I change it as Travel workflow in
> > client
> > 100 has run into error. The same I can't sent in case of leave workflow.
> So
> > is it possible to design based on the workflow template going into error)
> >
> > 2) Is it possible to add client detail also in the current standard mail
> > that is sent so that admin job is made easier
> >
> > 3) If both of the above options are not possible then I believe send mail
> > option in respective workflows is 1 option to notify WF admin. But how
> can
> > we check in workflow
> > whether that particular workflow instance has run into error? Is SWU3
> using
> > RSWWERRE report to check for error workitems and notifies admin?
> >
> > Please share your valuable inputs.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bharath
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110922/c220de89/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 05:36:35 -0400
> > From: Ramki Maley <rmaley at erpworkflow.com>
> > Subject: Re: Auto mail to WF Admin
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID: <4E7B01A3.7060508 at erpworkflow.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Bharath, please see the post System ID & Client in Workflow Admin email
> > <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/2010-May/032572.html> by Eddie
> > Morris.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Ramki.
> >
> > On 9/21/11 11:13 PM, Bharath Padmanabhan wrote:
> > > Dear Team,
> > >
> > > As we all know if we maintain workflow administrator in SWU3 Tcode a
> > > mail will be sent to that user whenever a workflow runs into error.
> > >
> > > I have 10 clients in PRD. When any workflow runs into error in any
> > > clients WF admin user is getting mail as expected. But there is no
> > > detail about the client in which the workflow went to error. Only
> > > workitem id is sent in mail. So WF admin has to login to all clients
> > > to identify which client has the problem.
> > >
> > > 1) Is it possible to tweak/customize the current standard message sent
> > > to WF admin. If yes, then will it be a global mail content change
> > > meaning that will the same be sent to all
> > > types of workflows? (Say for eg: If I change it as Travel workflow in
> > > client 100 has run into error. The same I can't sent in case of leave
> > > workflow. So is it possible to design based on the workflow template
> > > going into error)
> > >
> > > 2) Is it possible to add client detail also in the current standard
> > > mail that is sent so that admin job is made easier
> > >
> > > 3) If both of the above options are not possible then I believe send
> > > mail option in respective workflows is 1 option to notify WF admin.
> > > But how can we check in workflow
> > > whether that particular workflow instance has run into error? Is SWU3
> > > using RSWWERRE report to check for error workitems and notifies admin?
> > >
> > > Please share your valuable inputs.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Bharath
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110922/73f4d595/attachment.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> > End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21
> > ***************************************
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110922/c1968ef9/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:12:12 +0100 (BST)
> From: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
> Subject: Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <a684497d49951967389618fff11601ef.squirrel at g.mail.aaisp.net.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hello Bharath,
>
> It seems to me from your posts that you are treating these notifications
> as functional when they are a purely technical tool. They are very
> low-level and meant to be simple. They are not meant to be part of your
> business process, which is sounds like what you're doing.
>
> Consider incorporating regular exceptions into your workflow. If something
> happens all the time it should be modelled. And if part of your business
> process is that your WF admin fixes all the missing XYZs that happen all
> the time then it's not an error but part of your process. By all means
> send a work item or a mail to your WF admin and halt the workflow until
> it's resolved.
>
> Note that you can also customize who your workflow admin is at the
> workflow header. So you can send WF admin notifications to different
> addresses.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
> On Thu, September 22, 2011 10:51 am, Bharath Padmanabhan wrote:
> > Dear Ramki,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for that valuable link. I have shared with my basis guys to
> > implement the same.
> >
> > 1 more small querry - Is it possible to customize the standard text
> coming
> > in the mail to WF admin.
> >
> > If yes then where and how it can be done. Also if we customize will it be
> > a
> > global change in the sense that whatever workflow either
> > travel or leave or something else runs into error will the same
> customized
> > content be sent in mail or is it possible to make customization in that
> > mail
> > content for every workflow. Say 1 mail content for travel workflow & 1
> for
> > leave workflow - something like that.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bharath
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:06 PM, <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> >> sap-wug at mit.edu
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >> 1. W2 Reprint workflow (Banaga CM (Chris) at Aera)
> >> 2. Re: W2 Reprint workflow (Rick Bakker)
> >> 3. Auto mail to WF Admin (Bharath Padmanabhan)
> >> 4. Re: Auto mail to WF Admin (Ramki Maley)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:08:55 -0700
> >> From: "Banaga CM (Chris) at Aera" <CMBanaga at aeraenergy.com>
> >> Subject: W2 Reprint workflow
> >> To: "sap-wug at mit.edu" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <
> FB6591B98BB5DB47ADDF77478F7918CF102A1B2EB4 at BKMAIL71.aeraenergy.com
> >> >
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> We are using the standard SAP workflow WS01000090. After applying
> >> support
> >> packs in development, the step where an email is sent to the user is not
> >> happening. It is not showing up as an errored out workflow in
> >> SWI2_DIAG,
> >> but it is not working the same as it was before the support pack. Does
> >> anyone have any clues as to what the problem might be? Any help would
> >> be
> >> greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Christine Ba?aga
> >>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110921/e1ef484e/attachment-0001.htm
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:48:03 +1000
> >> From: Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: W2 Reprint workflow
> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <CAGSLasSf+Vuf04gUr=A-0ToG5n+872TZx8R=
> vbrm0C2Z+PXPEA at mail.gmail.com
> >> >
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> As always, look in the workflow log (SWI1) to see exactly what
> >> happened. Was the step executed? Look in Step History and in the
> >> container elements, perhaps an error message was returned.
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Rick Bakker
> >> hanabi technology
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Banaga CM (Chris) at Aera
> >> <CMBanaga at aeraenergy.com> wrote:
> >> > We are using the standard SAP workflow WS01000090.? After applying
> >> support
> >> > packs in development, the step where an email is sent to the user is
> >> not
> >> > happening.? It is not showing up as an errored out workflow in
> >> SWI2_DIAG,
> >> > but it is not working the same as it was before the support pack.?
> >> Does
> >> > anyone have any clues as to what the problem might be?? Any help would
> >> be
> >> > greatly appreciated.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Christine Ba?aga
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:43:43 +0530
> >> From: Bharath Padmanabhan <calltobharath at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Auto mail to WF Admin
> >> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> >> Message-ID:
> >> <
> CAP+rKF+azv74LL_gs7OtA2FTMuXk4AgXO65kkNSkWqUKWMgMig at mail.gmail.com
> >> >
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Dear Team,
> >>
> >> As we all know if we maintain workflow administrator in SWU3 Tcode a
> >> mail
> >> will be sent to that user whenever a workflow runs into error.
> >>
> >> I have 10 clients in PRD. When any workflow runs into error in any
> >> clients
> >> WF admin user is getting mail as expected. But there is no detail about
> >> the
> >> client in which the workflow went to error. Only workitem id is sent in
> >> mail. So WF admin has to login to all clients to identify which client
> >> has
> >> the problem.
> >>
> >> 1) Is it possible to tweak/customize the current standard message sent
> >> to
> >> WF
> >> admin. If yes, then will it be a global mail content change meaning that
> >> will the same be sent to all
> >> types of workflows? (Say for eg: If I change it as Travel workflow in
> >> client
> >> 100 has run into error. The same I can't sent in case of leave workflow.
> >> So
> >> is it possible to design based on the workflow template going into
> >> error)
> >>
> >> 2) Is it possible to add client detail also in the current standard mail
> >> that is sent so that admin job is made easier
> >>
> >> 3) If both of the above options are not possible then I believe send
> >> mail
> >> option in respective workflows is 1 option to notify WF admin. But how
> >> can
> >> we check in workflow
> >> whether that particular workflow instance has run into error? Is SWU3
> >> using
> >> RSWWERRE report to check for error workitems and notifies admin?
> >>
> >> Please share your valuable inputs.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Bharath
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110922/c220de89/attachment-0001.htm
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 05:36:35 -0400
> >> From: Ramki Maley <rmaley at erpworkflow.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Auto mail to WF Admin
> >> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >> Message-ID: <4E7B01A3.7060508 at erpworkflow.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Bharath, please see the post System ID & Client in Workflow Admin email
> >> <http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/2010-May/032572.html> by
> Eddie
> >> Morris.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Ramki.
> >>
> >> On 9/21/11 11:13 PM, Bharath Padmanabhan wrote:
> >> > Dear Team,
> >> >
> >> > As we all know if we maintain workflow administrator in SWU3 Tcode a
> >> > mail will be sent to that user whenever a workflow runs into error.
> >> >
> >> > I have 10 clients in PRD. When any workflow runs into error in any
> >> > clients WF admin user is getting mail as expected. But there is no
> >> > detail about the client in which the workflow went to error. Only
> >> > workitem id is sent in mail. So WF admin has to login to all clients
> >> > to identify which client has the problem.
> >> >
> >> > 1) Is it possible to tweak/customize the current standard message sent
> >> > to WF admin. If yes, then will it be a global mail content change
> >> > meaning that will the same be sent to all
> >> > types of workflows? (Say for eg: If I change it as Travel workflow in
> >> > client 100 has run into error. The same I can't sent in case of leave
> >> > workflow. So is it possible to design based on the workflow template
> >> > going into error)
> >> >
> >> > 2) Is it possible to add client detail also in the current standard
> >> > mail that is sent so that admin job is made easier
> >> >
> >> > 3) If both of the above options are not possible then I believe send
> >> > mail option in respective workflows is 1 option to notify WF admin.
> >> > But how can we check in workflow
> >> > whether that particular workflow instance has run into error? Is SWU3
> >> > using RSWWERRE report to check for error workitems and notifies admin?
> >> >
> >> > Please share your valuable inputs.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Bharath
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110922/73f4d595/attachment.htm
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SAP-WUG mailing list
> >> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >>
> >>
> >> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 21
> >> ***************************************
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 82, Issue 22
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110923/213483a9/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list