Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

[Dale Davis Jones]

Q1. Option B) Wait for good workitems
Q2. Optional comments ok.
 
Regards, 
 



From: ginger.gatling at sap.com
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:25:41 -0400
Subject: Mobile worklfow developers need your input!






Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for you:
Item 1:
If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application or bring it back from background after half an hour:
A)     See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.
B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.
 
 
Item 2:
For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around rejections.  The plan is to not require comments – but there will be an option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?  
 
So – please let us know what you think!
Thanks!
Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at ginger.gatling at sap.com) 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________ SAP-WUG mailing list SAP-WUG at mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110416/f9ab4d54/attachment.htm