Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

[Edward Diehl]

Like Greg,
Wait for the complete list.
Allow comments on rejection to be optional.


From: ginger.gatling at sap.com
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:25:41 -0400
Subject: Mobile worklfow developers need your input!



Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for you:Item 1:If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application or bring it back from background after half an hour:A)     See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.  Item 2:For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around rejections.  The plan is to not require comments – but there will be an option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?   So – please let us know what you think!Thanks!
Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at ginger.gatling at sap.com)    
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110416/b9b81db0/attachment.htm