Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

[Keohan, Susan - 1140 - MITLL]

Hi Ginger,
I think an up-to-date list of workitems is more important.
And notes on rejection can be optional.

Thanks for asking!
Sue

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Gatling, Ginger
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:26 PM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for you:
Item 1:
If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application or bring it back from background after half an hour:

A)      See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.

B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4 seconds) for it.


Item 2:
For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around rejections.  The plan is to not require comments - but there will be an option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?

So - please let us know what you think!
Thanks!
Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at ginger.gatling at sap.com<mailto:ginger.gatling at sap.com>)




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110416/d107cd7f/attachment.htm