Can Excluded Agent have multiple entries?
Shai Eyal
shai.eyal at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 8 06:43:40 EDT 2011
Mark,
It should work fine with mulitline.
Try using element based WFSYST-AGENT or RHOBJECTS-OBJECT.
Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow & BPM specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/shaieyal
Mobile: 972-52-5816633
Skype: Shai.Eyal
________________________________
From: "sap-wug-request at mit.edu" <sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2011 13:08:52
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 15
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
sap-wug at mit.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sap-wug-request at mit.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14 (Shai Eyal)
2. Can Excluded Agent have multiple entries?
(Daley, Mark [CONGB Non-J&J])
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Message-ID: <166285.28597.qm at web120704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Michael,
I strongly recommend not changing standard eval. Path SAP_TAGT. Besides
performance, you will loose a lot of standard functionality, such as standard
rules. But I do have alternatives: you can exclude the lower level agent within
a function base rule (by extending the rule you already use)?or use step
excluding agent functionality. I'd go with the first option. If you need the
details I'll be happy to assist.
Good luck.
?
Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow & BPM specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/shaieyal
Mobile: 972-52-5816633
Skype: Shai.Eyal
________________________________
From: "sap-wug-request at mit.edu" <sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2011 5:02:22
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
??? sap-wug at mit.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
??? http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
??? sap-wug-request at mit.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
??? sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
? 1. RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)... (Dart, Jocelyn)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 04:02:00 +0200
From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
Subject: RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
??? <8C507B5E0BA5114E933C3C6E2E9729E006BE3604E7 at DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
HI Michael,
Ed's correct? - but just be careful to watch for performance implications and
unintended side effects - as changing the evaluation path SAP_TAGT will affect
EVERY workflow/work item.
Might be worth asking the group if anyone else has tried this before... and what
their experiences were.
Regards
Jocelyn
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Edward Diehl
Sent: Friday, 8 April 2011 12:31 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...
Hi Michael,
We've just been through something like this with regard to including substitutes
(A210) in the eval path.? The eval path you want is SAP_TAGT.? In order to
include lower level org units and their position you need to insert a line just
before line 100:? ? 90 O B 002 * O.? This will get you all of the lower org
units and their positions.
Best wishes,
Ed
________________________________
Subject: RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:58:56 +0200
From: Michael.Klika at ids-scheer.com
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Hi Nat
Thank you very much for your reply.
I think (no, I'm sure) my question wasn't understandable:
The Inbox as well as several other tools (e.g. "display agents in workflow log",
standard transactions) derive users for a given workitem. My scenario is as
follows:
-? ? ? ? ? I've got a hierarchy of Orgunits
-? ? ? ? ? User is connected via User - Personnel Number - Position - Orgunit
-? ? ? ? ? My rule for a certain task produces a top orgunit
-? ? ? ? ? Only those users belonging to the top-orgunit will receive that
workitem, NOT the users belonging to orgunits underneath
Is it possible to change this behavior? Is there a standard evaluation path that
handles that an could be modified?
Thanks again and best regards,
Michael
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Nat
4 Govender
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:13 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Cc: sap-wug at mit.edu; sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Subject: Re: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...
There are two transaction that I know of that can use
1? ? ? ? SWI5? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -? ? ? ? which will show you all work items for
that specific User / Position.
2? ? ? ? SWI2_ADM1? ? ? ? -? ? ? ? Work item without agents
Regards
Nat Govender
Toyota South Africa
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist
Internal Ext.? :? 32645
Direct Line? ? :? +27 031 910 2645
Fax? ? ? ? ? ? ? :? 086 607 0414
E-mail? ? ? ? ? :? ngovender4 at toyota.co.za<mailto:ngovender4 at toyota.co.za>
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.
"Klika, Michael" <Michael.Klika at ids-scheer.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
2011/04/07 02:56 PM
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
To
<sap-wug at mit.edu>
cc
Subject
Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...
Hello workflow experts
I'm wondering what evaluation path exactly is used to determine for which
workitems I am an agent if I'm part of an orgstructure hierarchy with orgunits,
positions, personnel numbers and users. The rule I use determines orgunits only!
Or is there a different mechanism used? If I check table SWWORGTASK (storing
orgobjects for a particular workitem) I can see orgunits and no evaluated users,
so something must happen in between...
Is there any way to change the evaluation (even if this obviously doesn't make
too much sense...)
Thanks in advance,
Michael
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
***** This e-mail is a privileged and private communication and may be read,
copied and used only by the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended
recipient, please inform the sender by return e-mail with the subject heading
"Received in error". Please then delete the e-mail; destroy any copies of it and
do not disclose its contents to any person or entity. If you are not the
intended recipient, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. Neither the sender nor Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd
accepts any liability whatsoever as a result of the further dissemination of
this e-mail. Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd does not guarantee that e-mail
communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted,
corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain
viruses. *****
_______________________________________________ SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/1250f06c/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14
***************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/441a6d36/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:08:46 +0100
From: "Daley, Mark [CONGB Non-J&J]" <mdaley2 at its.jnj.com>
Subject: Can Excluded Agent have multiple entries?
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<CDD59EADBFC4C04DAB92FD7D47984F560657F2F7 at JNJGBHWGMS01.eu.jnj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi folks,
In my workflow step, I want to exclude several agents from receiving the
step. Is this possible, I'm getting an error.
In the Excluded agents field on the step I specify my container element
&EXCLUDEDAPPROVERS& that has a structure that is a table type based on
domain HROBJEC_14.
I get the following error.
We're on Ecc5. SAP_BASIS 640
Mark
Expression '&EXCLUDEDAPPROVERS&' has an invalid type or reference
Message no. WD288
Diagnosis
You have entered the expression . This has a data type reference that
cannot accept organizational objects.
System response
The expression is not permitted by the system.
Procedure
Use an expression that can accept organizational objects.
Procedure for System Administration
Use an ABAP Dictionary reference that refers to the domain HROBJEC_14 as
data type reference for the expression.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/07fdac28/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 15
***************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/7750bdcd/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list