<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:tahoma, new york, times, serif;font-size:10pt"><DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Mark,</DIV>
<DIV>It should work fine with mulitline.</DIV>
<DIV>Try using element based WFSYST-AGENT or RHOBJECTS-OBJECT.<BR> </DIV>
<P><FONT color=#00007f size=2 face="verdana, helvetica, sans-serif"><STRONG>Regards,<BR>Shai Eyal</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Verdana><STRONG>SAP Logistics senior consultant<BR>SAP Workflow & BPM specialist</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P><FONT color=#000080 size=2 face=Verdana><STRONG><A href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/shaieyal" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.linkedin.com/in/shaieyal</A><BR>Mobile: 972-52-5816633</STRONG></FONT></P>
<P><STRONG><FONT color=#007f40 size=2 face=Verdana>Skype: Shai.Eyal</FONT></STRONG><BR><BR><BR></P>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: tahoma, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> "sap-wug-request@mit.edu" <sap-wug-request@mit.edu><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> sap-wug@mit.edu<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Friday, April 8, 2011 13:08:52<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 15<BR></FONT><BR>Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<BR> <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR> <A href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>You can reach the person managing
the list at<BR> <A href="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu">sap-wug-owner@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR> 1. Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14 (Shai Eyal)<BR> 2. Can Excluded Agent have multiple entries?<BR> (Daley, Mark [CONGB Non-J&J])<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:15:00 -0700 (PDT)<BR>From: Shai Eyal <<A href="mailto:shai.eyal@yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:shai.eyal@yahoo.com">shai.eyal@yahoo.com</A>><BR>Subject: Re: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14<BR>To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR>Message-ID: <<A href="mailto:166285.28597.qm@web120704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com"
ymailto="mailto:166285.28597.qm@web120704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com">166285.28597.qm@web120704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Hi Michael,<BR>I strongly recommend not changing standard eval. Path SAP_TAGT. Besides <BR>performance, you will loose a lot of standard functionality, such as standard <BR>rules. But I do have alternatives: you can exclude the lower level agent within <BR>a function base rule (by extending the rule you already use)?or use step <BR>excluding agent functionality. I'd go with the first option. If you need the <BR>details I'll be happy to assist.<BR>Good luck.<BR><BR>?<BR>Regards,<BR>Shai Eyal<BR>SAP Logistics senior consultant<BR>SAP Workflow & BPM specialist<BR><A href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/shaieyal" target=_blank>http://www.linkedin.com/in/shaieyal</A><BR>Mobile: 972-52-5816633<BR>Skype: Shai.Eyal<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>________________________________<BR>From: "<A
href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A>" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A>><BR>To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR>Sent: Friday, April 8, 2011 5:02:22<BR>Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14<BR><BR>Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to<BR>??? <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>??? <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>??? <A href="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-request@mit.edu">sap-wug-request@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the
list at<BR>??? <A href="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-owner@mit.edu">sap-wug-owner@mit.edu</A><BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR>? 1. RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)... (Dart, Jocelyn)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 04:02:00 +0200<BR>From: "Dart, Jocelyn" <<A href="mailto:jocelyn.dart@sap.com" ymailto="mailto:jocelyn.dart@sap.com">jocelyn.dart@sap.com</A>><BR>Subject: RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID:<BR>??? <<A href="mailto:8C507B5E0BA5114E933C3C6E2E9729E006BE3604E7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp"
ymailto="mailto:8C507B5E0BA5114E933C3C6E2E9729E006BE3604E7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp">8C507B5E0BA5114E933C3C6E2E9729E006BE3604E7@DEWDFECCR01.wdf.sap.corp</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR><BR>HI Michael,<BR>Ed's correct? - but just be careful to watch for performance implications and <BR>unintended side effects - as changing the evaluation path SAP_TAGT will affect <BR>EVERY workflow/work item.<BR>Might be worth asking the group if anyone else has tried this before... and what <BR>their experiences were.<BR>Regards<BR>Jocelyn<BR><BR>From: <A href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [mailto:<A href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On Behalf Of <BR>Edward Diehl<BR>Sent: Friday, 8 April 2011 12:31 AM<BR>To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu"
ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR>Subject: RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...<BR><BR>Hi Michael,<BR>We've just been through something like this with regard to including substitutes <BR>(A210) in the eval path.? The eval path you want is SAP_TAGT.? In order to <BR>include lower level org units and their position you need to insert a line just <BR>before line 100:? ? 90 O B 002 * O.? This will get you all of the lower org <BR>units and their positions.<BR><BR>Best wishes,<BR>Ed<BR>________________________________<BR>Subject: RE: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...<BR>Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:58:56 +0200<BR>From: <A href="mailto:Michael.Klika@ids-scheer.com" ymailto="mailto:Michael.Klika@ids-scheer.com">Michael.Klika@ids-scheer.com</A><BR>To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A><BR>Hi Nat<BR><BR>Thank you very much for your reply.<BR><BR>I think (no, I'm sure) my question wasn't
understandable:<BR><BR>The Inbox as well as several other tools (e.g. "display agents in workflow log", <BR>standard transactions) derive users for a given workitem. My scenario is as <BR>follows:<BR><BR>-? ? ? ? ? I've got a hierarchy of Orgunits<BR>-? ? ? ? ? User is connected via User - Personnel Number - Position - Orgunit<BR>-? ? ? ? ? My rule for a certain task produces a top orgunit<BR>-? ? ? ? ? Only those users belonging to the top-orgunit will receive that <BR>workitem, NOT the users belonging to orgunits underneath<BR><BR>Is it possible to change this behavior? Is there a standard evaluation path that <BR>handles that an could be modified?<BR><BR>Thanks again and best regards,<BR>Michael<BR><BR><BR><BR>From: <A href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> [mailto:<A href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A>] On Behalf
Of Nat <BR>4 Govender<BR>Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:13 PM<BR>To: SAP Workflow Users' Group<BR>Cc: <A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>; <A href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A><BR>Subject: Re: Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...<BR><BR><BR>There are two transaction that I know of that can use<BR>1? ? ? ? SWI5? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -? ? ? ? which will show you all work items for <BR>that specific User / Position.<BR>2? ? ? ? SWI2_ADM1? ? ? ? -? ? ? ? Work item without agents<BR><BR><BR>Regards<BR>Nat Govender<BR>Toyota South Africa<BR>IT - SAP Workflow Specialist<BR>Internal Ext.? :? 32645<BR>Direct Line? ? :? +27 031 910 2645<BR>Fax? ? ? ? ? ? ? :? 086 607 0414<BR>E-mail? ? ? ? ? :? <A href="mailto:ngovender4@toyota.co.za" ymailto="mailto:ngovender4@toyota.co.za">ngovender4@toyota.co.za</A><mailto:<A
href="mailto:ngovender4@toyota.co.za" ymailto="mailto:ngovender4@toyota.co.za">ngovender4@toyota.co.za</A>><BR><BR>If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.<BR>"Klika, Michael" <<A href="mailto:Michael.Klika@ids-scheer.com" ymailto="mailto:Michael.Klika@ids-scheer.com">Michael.Klika@ids-scheer.com</A>><BR>Sent by: <A href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A><BR>2011/04/07 02:56 PM<BR>Please respond to<BR>"SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR><BR><BR>To<BR><BR><<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR><BR>cc<BR><BR>Subject<BR><BR>Evaluation path for Inbox (SBWP)...<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Hello workflow experts<BR><BR>I'm wondering what evaluation path exactly is used to determine for which <BR>workitems I am an agent
if I'm part of an orgstructure hierarchy with orgunits, <BR>positions, personnel numbers and users. The rule I use determines orgunits only!<BR><BR>Or is there a different mechanism used? If I check table SWWORGTASK (storing <BR>orgobjects for a particular workitem) I can see orgunits and no evaluated users, <BR>so something must happen in between...<BR><BR>Is there any way to change the evaluation (even if this obviously doesn't make <BR>too much sense...)<BR><BR>Thanks in advance,<BR>Michael<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR><BR><BR>***** This e-mail is a privileged and private communication and may be read, <BR>copied and used only by the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended
<BR>recipient, please inform the sender by return e-mail with the subject heading <BR>"Received in error". Please then delete the e-mail; destroy any copies of it and <BR>do not disclose its contents to any person or entity. If you are not the <BR>intended recipient, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any <BR>action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited <BR>and may be unlawful. Neither the sender nor Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd <BR>accepts any liability whatsoever as a result of the further dissemination of <BR>this e-mail. Toyota South Africa Motors (Pty) Ltd does not guarantee that e-mail <BR>communications are secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, <BR>corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain <BR>viruses. *****<BR><BR>_______________________________________________ SAP-WUG mailing list <BR><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu"
ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A> <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: <BR><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/1250f06c/attachment.htm" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/1250f06c/attachment.htm</A><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR><BR><BR>End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 14<BR>***************************************<BR><BR><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML
attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/441a6d36/attachment-0001.htm" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/441a6d36/attachment-0001.htm</A><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:08:46 +0100<BR>From: "Daley, Mark [CONGB Non-J&J]" <<A href="mailto:mdaley2@its.jnj.com" ymailto="mailto:mdaley2@its.jnj.com">mdaley2@its.jnj.com</A>><BR>Subject: Can Excluded Agent have multiple entries?<BR>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <<A href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">sap-wug@mit.edu</A>><BR>Message-ID:<BR> <<A href="mailto:CDD59EADBFC4C04DAB92FD7D47984F560657F2F7@JNJGBHWGMS01.eu.jnj.com" ymailto="mailto:CDD59EADBFC4C04DAB92FD7D47984F560657F2F7@JNJGBHWGMS01.eu.jnj.com">CDD59EADBFC4C04DAB92FD7D47984F560657F2F7@JNJGBHWGMS01.eu.jnj.com</A>><BR>Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR><BR>Hi folks,<BR><BR><BR><BR>In my workflow step, I want to exclude several agents from receiving the<BR>step. Is this possible, I'm getting an error.<BR><BR><BR><BR>In the Excluded agents field on the step I specify my container element<BR>&EXCLUDEDAPPROVERS& that has a structure that is a table type based on<BR>domain HROBJEC_14.<BR><BR><BR><BR>I get the following error.<BR><BR><BR><BR>We're on Ecc5. SAP_BASIS 640<BR><BR><BR><BR>Mark<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Expression '&EXCLUDEDAPPROVERS&' has an invalid type or reference<BR><BR>Message no. WD288<BR><BR>Diagnosis<BR><BR>You have entered the expression . This has a data type reference that<BR>cannot accept organizational objects.<BR><BR>System response<BR><BR>The expression is not permitted by the system.<BR><BR>Procedure<BR><BR>Use an expression that can accept organizational objects.<BR><BR>Procedure for System Administration<BR><BR>Use an ABAP
Dictionary reference that refers to the domain HROBJEC_14 as<BR>data type reference for the expression.<BR><BR><BR><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: <A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/07fdac28/attachment.htm" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110408/07fdac28/attachment.htm</A><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu" ymailto="mailto:SAP-WUG@mit.edu">SAP-WUG@mit.edu</A><BR><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug" target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A><BR><BR><BR>End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 77, Issue 15<BR>***************************************<BR></DIV></DIV></div><br></body></html>