Wait step using correlation - NEW!

[Schmidt, Jake]

Hi Ed thanks I appreciate anything you can give me.  No rush since I've
ABAPed my way to a solution (I really know what the key for the next
task will be since the other part of the key is a counter that just
increments by one).  This was just the first time where I had an excuse
to use a correlation.  I'll look forward to any information that comes
out so I'll have something to play with in sandbox!!

Thanks
Jake Schmidt




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:51:44 -0600
From: Edward Diehl <edwarddiehl at hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Wait step using correlation - NEW!
To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <COL104-W540579AF68A417EED06DAEA2630 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Sorry, but the sandbox system where I built this is no longer.  If I get
some time to re-create this, I will get back to you.  It's crunch time
on my current project.

 

Ed
 


From: edwarddiehl at hotmail.com
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: RE: Wait step using correlation - NEW!
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:32:26 -0600



Hi Jake,
It's been a long time since I played around with correlations.  I have
never had the opportunity to actually put one in production.  I put a
blog on SDN covering the whole process of setting up a correction.  As a
part of developing the blog I built a prototype that did work.  Let me
see if I can find that prototype and to see how the event was entered.
 
Kudos for giving it a try.  I'll get back to you.
Ed
 
> Subject: RE: Wait step using correlation - NEW!
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:01:06 -0600
> From: jake.schmidt at spiritaero.com
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> 
> Hey WUG,
> 
> I'm replying to a rather old WUG message but it is the latest around
> correlations I could find. I'm having trouble on both an ECC 5.0
> SAPKB64018 and an ECC 6.0 SAPKB70103 box when trying to get a
> correlation to work. I can define my correlation in SWF_CRL1 (I hope
> I'm defining it right can't test it yet). I can add my wait step with
> correlation following the instructions in OSS 1335009. My problem
> arises with the activation part via a process control step. When you
> select a PC step and set to function 9 Activate Correlation the "Name
of
> Event" field has no values other than local events. I can type my
> correlation name, base element, and a correlation instance (based on
> CL_SWF_MOD_CORRELATION)...however I get an error because I lack an
> event. It seems buggy but maybe I'm doing something wrong...??
> 
> I'm trying to correlate a quality notification BUS2078 to tasks QMSM.
> The key for BUS2078 is a partial key for QMSM. I believe this
qualifies
> as something to use correlations for. Below is the best WUG message
> around correlations. The SAP help is weak, the second edition of
> Practical Workflow doesn't touch on correlations, I found 1 SDN power
> point that wasn't helpful, OSS isn't helpful other than the note Ed
> mentioned below. Taking all that into account I'm curious how many
> people use correlations or recommend them?
> 
> I'll provide more info as requested.
> 
> Thank you WUG
> Jake Schmidt
> Workflow Developer - Spirit Aerosystems
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Edward Diehl edwarddiehl at hotmail.com
> Tue Apr 28 12:49:10 EDT 2009
> 
> * Previous message: Excel attachment not attached in Workflow
> * Next message: Extended notifications
> * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> 
> Hi WUGgers,
> 
> Awhile back I asked if anyone out there had successfully implemented a
> correlation wait step. I didn't get any response, so either no one has
> tried it or gave up when they did.
> 
> Let me encourage you to investigate the correlation mechanism - an
event
> mechanism on steroids. In one of our workflows here we are using it to
> "listen" for an inbound IDOC that applies a credit for a material
> return. The IDOC object instance cannot possibly be known at the time
> the workflow is initiated - hence the need for a mechanism that uses
> anecdotal information; i.e. the FI-AR document number, which is known
to
> the IDOC object as well as the workflow.
> 
> Well, it turns out there is a bug in the correlation mechanism. It
will
> be fixed in OSS 1335009, which has not yet been released. There is
> however, a workaround I got from the SAP developer. Please see the
> attachment.
> 
> First, create the correlation wait step and activate the workflow
> template. The correlation step will fail without doing the following
as
> outlined in the attachment:
> 
> 1. Uncheck the "Use Correlation" box.
> 2. Using F4, select the object from the workflow container. 
> 3. Check the "Use Correlation" box and it will take you back to your
> original correlation cofig.
> 
> That's it.
> 
> Let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Ed Diehl
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug