un-subscribe my id from this list please

Wed Nov 5 12:52:08 EST 2008

un-subscribe my id from this list please 

sap-wug-request at mit.edu wrote:  Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. RE: Deadline Monitoring Scenario (Maue, Thomas)
2. RE: Changes To Park Document (Stephens, Monique S L)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 12:20:24 -0500
From: "Maue, Thomas" 
Subject: RE: Deadline Monitoring Scenario
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" 
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Tom,

That is correct although annoying. UWL is designed to work only with
the workitems in the folder "Workplace - Inbox". Items in other
sub-folders (deadlines) are not displayed in the UWL. Solution is to
create modeled deadlines but then you have a different workitem (same
task). Another workitem means a delay in seeing it on the Portal side
even with the refresh functionality. I am doing the same thing right
now and obsolete the original workitem.

My next step is to try the special Workflow header level event
"Reevaluate rules on active work items".

Thanks,

Thomas

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Simon, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 7:32 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Re: Deadline Monitoring Scenario

Thomas,

I am using the UWL in the Portal. After testing the
deadline with a text only option, these deadline messages do not show up
in the UWL. They do show up in R3. A modeled deadline is the only way
to execute a step that would create a workitem for an agent and get
pulled into the UWL. I am trying to find a way to send the same
workitem that has a deadline executed to the superior of the agent who
was supposed to execute the original workitem. 

Tom,

There are multiple ways to handle this. One simple way is to choose the
deadline tab of your choice, do not model the deadline and you will see
a 'Recipient of message when latest end missed'. You can put a rule in
here to find the 2nd level or use an expression if the approval agents
are captured already.

In this case you are correct that once one selects, the workitem is
removed from the other's work list.

Regards,

Thomas Maue

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Simon, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:39 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Re: Deadline Monitoring Scenario

Shai,

Thank you for the help with the determining the next level agent
for a deadline monitoring scenario. I created a rule as you suggested ,
using a "z" version of function module SWX_GET_MANAGER. I modifed the
source code to repeat getting the immediate superior, first for the
initiator, then for the initators superior.

This rule works in obtaining the next level manager. 

I have another question on the deadline scenario. The requirements are
that the 2nd level approver receives the approval task if the 1st level
approver does not complete the workitem. Is it possible to send the
same workitem to this 2nd level approver when the deadline has passed
or do I have to execute a new approver step using the same task senario
that was used for the 1st level approver. The reason I am asking is
that if I there is a way to send the same workitem to the second level
approver after the deadline has passed I assume that when either
approver selects the workitem it should be removed from the other
approvers worklist. Otherwise, I am creating a new workitem for the
second approver and must decide to obsolete the original workitem in the
1st approvers worklist. If I didn't obsolete the original workitem it
appears to me that I would then have two different workitems out there
waiting to be completed by two different agents? What do you think? 

Tom 

-----------------------------------------
This transmission is intended only for use by the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient you should not
read, disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use the
information contained in this transmission. The information
contained in this transmission may be confidential and/or
privileged. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this transmission
including any attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20081105/75ecce5b/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 11:27:06 -0600
From: "Stephens, Monique S L" 
Subject: RE: Changes To Park Document
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" 
Cc: 
Message-ID:
<3F7CB4C8A54B7D4A867BD3F6B40AB1DC082B8CE0 at BCMEVS8.ad.bcm.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

We are on SAP ECC 6.0. But, I don't think the path is any different. In the IMG, I took the following path: Financial Accounting --> Global Settings --> Document --> Document Parking. There are separate areas for resetting approvals. You can specify which fields will restart workflow. You will
also need to run report RFBIPPG2 in each client after you transport.

Monique

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Nat 4 Govender
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 12:35 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Cc: SAP Workflow Users' Group; sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Subject: RE: Changes To Park Document

Hi Monique,

Are you aware of what config needs to be done in order to endure that when a document is changed and the user performs a document check and then a document complete that a new workflow is started similar to that when the user makes the change and save the document.

Regards

Nat Govender
Toyota South Africa
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist
Internal Ext. : 32645
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645
Fax : +27 031 910 4964 / 031 902 9633 / 086 607 0414
E-mail : ngovender4 at toyota.co.za 

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. 
"Stephens, Monique S L" 

"Stephens, Monique S L" 
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu 

03-11-2008 03:40 PM 

Please respond to
"SAP Workflow Users' Group" 

To

"SAP Workflow Users' Group" 

cc

Subject

RE: Changes To Park Document 

I figured this was standard SAP. When a user saves the parked document, our workflow shows "logically deleted". Then, if they go back in and complete it, workflow starts all over again. If the user completed it the first time, workflow continues as it normally would (unless you have some config that
re-starts workflow if certain changes are made).

Monique Stephens

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Nat 4 Govender
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 10:55 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Cc: SAP Workflow Users' Group; sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Subject: Changes To Park Document

Hi All,

We have small issue with the changes to parked document.

When a user changes the parked document and saves it first before doing a document check and document complete the old workflow is deleted and a new one starts however when the user changes a parked document and just performs a document check and document complete this does not happen.

Has any had this experience.

Please advise.

Regards

Nat Govender
E-mail : ngovender4 at toyota.co.za 

If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. _______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20081105/35d71f3f/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: graycol.gif
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20081105/35d71f3f/attachment.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: ecblank.gif
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20081105/35d71f3f/attachment-0001.gif

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 48, Issue 11
***************************************

SUKUMAR SELVAM,SAP Consultant, Georgia, USAMobile : 678-472-3216

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20081105/55ad25c6/attachment.htm