Is WF Logical destination required

[Mike Pokraka]

Theoretically it's possible. Whether it's a good idea is an entirely
different debate... 

In the event linkage you have the option of changing the event delivery to
synchronous, and I suspect it may be possible to tweak all background tasks
to execute in dialog. This would still run in background as long as the WF
was started by a BG process. 

 

Cheers, 

Mike

 

 

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
Alon Raskin
Sent: 28 June 2008 13:11
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Is WF Logical destination required

 

Fellow Wuggers,

 

I was recently told by a BASIS person that the logical destination for
workflow (the one generated in SWU3) is not actually required. After I
picked myself up off the floor I explained that it was my understanding that
it was quite necessary. To add to my confusion, I did see workflows
triggering and running the system. My understanding was that the logical
destination was used to enable the tRFC functionality which ensured that the
Workflow did execute even if not enough system resources were available.
Mark Pyc (thanks Mark) also shared his understanding which was that the
logical destination is used to make sure that the Workflow code executes in
its own logical unit work. I am not sure if anything I have written is right
so I would appreciate it if people could share their understanding. 

 

Is the logical destination required? 

What precisely is its its role?

 

Alon Raskin

e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080628/30cacef6/attachment.htm