Limit the number of WI in inbox

[Lalitha Sankaran]

Hi Mike,

Thanks for your explaination,this is exactly what I wanted to know,
We were analysing the performance impact.

Appreciate it
Lalitha


On 1/26/08, Mike Pokraka <asap at workflowconnections.com> wrote:
>
>  The only problem I've experienced is that over 32,000-odd items the item
> count shown in the folder tree becomes corrupt. However if you have that
> many items I think there are other more important issues to contend with. I
> think the same may apply in your scenario: if users have 2000 items pending
> then it may be time to review the way you're using workflow.
>
>
>
> You can always use the 'grouped by' views to filter WIs by task or
> otherwise.
>
>
>
> Performance issues are related to the overall amount of open items, not
> just a single user. In other words, of there are 50,000,000 workitems in a
> ready status, then the user with 10 items in their inbox will have almost as
> bas a response time as the user with 2000.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Lalitha Sankaran
> *Sent:* 25 January 2008 01:05
> *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
> *Subject:* Limit the number of WI in inbox
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Is there a maximum number limit for the number of Workitems in SBWP,
>
>
>
> If there is none, then will the performance be effected when a user goes
> into his inbox to forward workitems ?
>
>
>
> If in anyway we can limit the number that is displayed to the user by task
> or date, how would we go abt doing it ?
>
>
>
> approximately they are expecting 2000 WI to be present in the inbox.
>
>
>
> Appreciate any input
>
> thank you
>
> lalitha
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080127/cc5cf1cb/attachment.htm