Checking WF template versions

[Mike Gambier]

And sometimes no. If I were you I'd be sure the current active version of the Workflow is indeed the same as the 'Transport' version in table SWDSHEADER, i.e. you're comparing-current-active-version in system A with current-active-version in system B.
 
Occasionally the activation of a definition can fail leaving you with the impression that 'current' WF Definition is the latest version available, which isn't always the case.
If you're after definitive reliable proof that two definitions are a match (at least in terms of the step order and task details) you can always try the old trick of 'printing' both definitions in SWDD by using the menu path: 
 
     Workflow->Print->Details 
 
And then do a line by line comparison between the printouts.
 
This should reassure you that the steps are the same and also help you check for things like binding and agent determination (at the Workflow level) as well.
 
As Mike said though, the definition is only the set of rules that Workflow follows. You might also want to have a look at the Business Objects and other code the WF Definition might invoke at runtime.
 
Regards,
 
Mike GT
> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:27:40 +0100> Subject: Re: Checking WF template versions> From: wug at workflowconnections.com> To: sap-wug at mit.edu> > Well, technically speaking yes. That's assuming your question really is> only about the workflow template.> It will not guarantee that one of the tasks hasn't changed or the> structure of one of your container elements is not different, or perhaps> someone modified a method... or even a function module called by a> function module called by a method in a task in your workflow.> > Cheers,> Mike> > On Wed, April 9, 2008 12:21 pm, akshay.bhagwat at wipro.com wrote:> > Hi All,> >> > We are in a kind of support project .> > We wanted to be sure that the Workflow templates which are available in> > DEV system are exactly corresponding to the ones in PRE-PROD system.> > In this case , If we only ensure that technical information - i.e.> > change data - on WF template header is same in both the systems , then> > can we assume that WF template is in sync in both the systems?> >> >> > Thanks and Regards,> >> > Akshay Bhagwat> >> > SAP Practice> >> > Wipro Technologies> >> >> >> > The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments> > to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and> > may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you> > are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or> > copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all> > copies of this message and any attachments.> >> > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient> > should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.> > The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus> > transmitted by this email.> >> > www.wipro.com> >> > _______________________________________________> > SAP-WUG mailing list> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> >> > > _______________________________________________> SAP-WUG mailing list> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
_________________________________________________________________
Win 100’s of Virgin Experience days with BigSnapSearch.com
http://www.bigsnapsearch.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080409/f4df732b/attachment.htm