SRM WF's

Fri May 11 12:22:04 EDT 2007

Veit,

   I did some more investigating on the SRM WF's & yes if you have a WF activated w/a condition & the condition isn't met you will get the 'No Approval WF Found' message. And if you have 2 WF's activated with the same Event w/varying conditions the conditions have to be opposite enough so that it wouldn't be possible for them both to be satisfied or you'll get the 'WF is Ambiguous' message. If I remember correctly in R/3 it's not so restrictive, it will let you have no WF triggered or both triggered. My apologies to the group for not changing the Subject, but I thought I was replying to Eddie on another related issue email we've been communicating on.

Jeffrey A. Rappaport
Business-Workflow, LLC
Voice: (732) 355-0123
Fax:     (509) 757-4144
Email: Jeff at Business-Workflow.com
Web:  www.Business-Workflow.com

   The information contained in this message maybe privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If the Reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error and would like to be removed from any future mailings from this Sender, please hit 'Reply' to this email with "REMOVE" in the Subject line.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Veit Unger 
  To: SAP Workflow Users' Group 
  Cc: SAP Workflow Users' Group ; sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu 
  Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 5:08 AM
  Subject: [SPAM] RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c

  Hi Jeff, 

  there must be a condition for every thinkable case. For those cases where you do not need approval you can use simple standard templates that just run through automatically without approval. In case of Shopping Cart you can use WS10000060 as an example. 

  kind regards, 
  Veit Unger 

  -- 
  Dipl. WiInf. Veit Unger 
  - 
  veit.unger at de.ibm.com 
  Telefon: +(49) 170 914 7650 
  - SerCon GmbH 
        Nahmitzer Damm 12 - 12277 Berlin . Germany 
        c/o IBM Deutschland GmbH 
        IBM Global Business Services  

  SerCon Service-Konzepte für Informations-Systeme GmbH
  Geschäftsführung: Jörg Schimetzek, Bernhard Settele
  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Ehningen
  Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243109

        "Morris, Eddie" <eddie.morris at sap.com> 
        Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu 
        11.05.2007 10:35 Please respond to
              "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu> 

       To "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>  
              cc  
              Subject RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c 

  Hi Jeff,

  I have not seen this before.....I work more on traditional workflow
  rather than SRM specific. Let me look into it.

  Regards,
  Eddie 

  -----Original Message-----
  From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
  Of Jeffrey A. Rappaport
  Sent: 10 May 10, 2007 17:35
  To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
  Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c

  Eddie,

    Sorry to email you directly on this, but was looking for a quick &
  correct answer. On the SRM WF's like SC & PO, when you have WF Start
  Conditions defined & the User creates a SC or PO that doesn't meet the
  conditions then they get the error message "No Approval WF Found". My
  question is, is this how it's supposed to work or is it a bug? And if
  it is std. then how does the User have the capability to place the
  Order when not meeting the conditions & doesn't need an Approval WF?

  Thanx,

  Jeffrey A. Rappaport
  www.Business-Workflow.com

  > Hi Rick/Sherie,
  >
  > Note 961466 changed the behaviour and no longer allowed you to change
  > tasks via the builder.
  >
  > Implement note 1025255 to fix this.
  >
  > Regards,
  > Eddie
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
  Behalf
  > Of Munday,Sherie J.
  > Sent: 10 May 10, 2007 14:48
  > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
  > Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c
  >
  > Rick,
  > I agree with your frustration on the PFTC_CHG flipping to display.
  > Since our upgrade, we have had to get used to opening the TS in a
  > separate window in the change mode and then return to the parent....
  > Pain in the ...   I would be most interested to see if the other
  > wugger's are experiencing this same pain.
  >
  > We did not experience any missing elements when we upgraded.
  > Best of Luck,
  > Sherie
  >
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
  Behalf
  > Of Sample, Rick
  > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:25 AM
  > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
  > Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c
  >
  > No. I am referring to when the conversion finished the WF Templates
  are
  > missing elements. And we are latest patch.
  > I have added them to WF to get them working but wanted to know what
  the
  > reason is so we can fix it before we convert.
  >
  > Also, for some reason when I add an element PA0001-ENAME for example,
  to
  > the "ABAP Dict Reference" and save, it changes itself to "ABAP Dict.
  > Data Type".
  >
  > And, when I am in PFTC_CHG and open a task of the WF it flips to
  > Display.
  > No option to modify task in Change mode. Arrrggghhh!~ Very annoying!
  >
  > Rick
  >
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
  Behalf
  > Of Munday,Sherie J.
  > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:50 PM
  > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
  > Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c
  >
  > Rick,
  > Were the missing container elements initial values?  If so, take a
  look
  > at OSS note 969389.
  > Cheers,
  > Sherie
  >
  > Sherie Munday
  > SAP Workflow Developer/ Analyst
  > Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
  >
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
  Behalf
  > Of Sample, Rick
  > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:34 PM
  > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
  > Subject: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c
  >
  > We have in our sandbox ECC 6. (A few of issues). Any pointers on any
  is
  > appreciated!
  >
  > 1.
  > I am missing WF containers elements after conversion and can't find a
  > pattern.
  > Is there any utilities to run to compare old / new?
  >
  > 2.
  > Deadline Monitor running but not picking up deadlines.
  > I had this up and running last month. Now, it is "running" but my
  > deadlines are not triggering.
  >
  > Rick
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > SAP-WUG mailing list
  > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > SAP-WUG mailing list
  > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
  >
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > SAP-WUG mailing list
  > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > SAP-WUG mailing list
  > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
  >
  > _______________________________________________
  > SAP-WUG mailing list
  > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
  >

  _______________________________________________
  SAP-WUG mailing list
  SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

  _______________________________________________
  SAP-WUG mailing list
  SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  SAP-WUG mailing list
  SAP-WUG at mit.edu
  http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070511/04541c82/attachment.htm