<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16397" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face="Bookman Old Style" color=#0000ff size=2>Veit,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Bookman Old Style" color=#0000ff size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Bookman Old Style" color=#0000ff size=2> I did some
more investigating on the SRM WF's & yes if you have a WF activated w/a
condition & the condition isn't met you will get the 'No Approval WF Found'
message. And if you have 2 WF's activated with the same Event w/varying
conditions the conditions have to be opposite enough so that it
wouldn't be possible for them both to be satisfied or you'll get the 'WF is
Ambiguous' message. If I remember correctly in R/3 it's not so restrictive, it
will let you have no WF triggered or both triggered. My apologies to the group
for not changing the Subject, but I thought I was replying to Eddie on another
related issue email we've been communicating on.</FONT></DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>
<DIV><BR>Jeffrey A. Rappaport<BR>Business-Workflow, LLC<BR>Voice: (732)
355-0123<BR>Fax: (509) 757-4144<BR>Email: <A
href="mailto:Jeff@Business-Workflow.com">Jeff@Business-Workflow.com</A><BR>Web:
<A href="http://www.Business-Workflow.com">www.Business-Workflow.com</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR> The information contained in this message maybe
privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If the Reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error and would like to
be removed from any future mailings from this Sender, please hit 'Reply' to this
email with "REMOVE" in the Subject line.<BR></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=veit.unger@de.ibm.com href="mailto:veit.unger@de.ibm.com">Veit
Unger</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=sap-wug@mit.edu
href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">SAP Workflow Users' Group</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Cc:</B> <A title=sap-wug@mit.edu
href="mailto:sap-wug@mit.edu">SAP Workflow Users' Group</A> ; <A
title=sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 11, 2007 5:08 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [SPAM] RE: ECC 6 technical
upgrade from 4.6c</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Hi Jeff,</FONT>
<BR><BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>there must be a condition for every
thinkable case. For those cases where you do not need approval you can use
simple standard templates that just run through automatically without
approval. In case of Shopping Cart you can use WS10000060 as an
example.</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>kind regards,</FONT>
<BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Veit Unger</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2><BR></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#0080ff size=2><BR>--
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#b2b2b2 size=2><BR>Dipl. WiInf. Veit Unger <BR>-
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=blue size=2><U><BR></U></FONT><A
href="mailto:veit.unger@de.ibm.com "><FONT face=Arial color=#0080ff
size=2><U>veit.unger@de.ibm.com </U></FONT></A><FONT face=Arial color=#b2b2b2
size=2><BR>Telefon: +(49) 170 914 7650 <BR>- </FONT>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width="100%"><A href="http://www.sercon.de/"><FONT face=Arial
color=#0080ff size=2><U>SerCon GmbH</U></FONT></A><FONT size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#b2b2b2 size=2><BR>Nahmitzer Damm 12 -
12277 Berlin . Germany <BR>c/o IBM Deutschland GmbH <BR>IBM Global
Business Services </FONT></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR><FONT face=Arial
color=#b2b2b2 size=1>SerCon Service-Konzepte für Informations-Systeme
GmbH<BR>Geschäftsführung: Jörg Schimetzek, Bernhard Settele<BR>Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Ehningen<BR>Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB
243109<BR><BR></FONT><BR><BR><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD width="40%"><FONT face=sans-serif size=1><B>"Morris, Eddie"
<eddie.morris@sap.com></B> </FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=1>Sent by: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu</FONT>
<P><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>11.05.2007 10:35</FONT>
<TABLE border=1>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD bgColor=white>
<DIV align=center><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>Please respond
to<BR>"SAP Workflow Users' Group"
<sap-wug@mit.edu></FONT></DIV></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR></P>
<TD width="59%">
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>To</FONT></DIV>
<TD><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>"SAP Workflow Users' Group"
<sap-wug@mit.edu></FONT>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>cc</FONT></DIV>
<TD>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>Subject</FONT></DIV>
<TD><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from
4.6c</FONT></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>
<TABLE>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR><BR><TT><FONT
size=2>Hi Jeff,<BR><BR>I have not seen this before.....I work more on
traditional workflow<BR>rather than SRM specific. Let me look into
it.<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Eddie <BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf<BR>Of
Jeffrey A. Rappaport<BR>Sent: 10 May 10, 2007 17:35<BR>To: SAP Workflow Users'
Group<BR>Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from
4.6c<BR><BR>Eddie,<BR><BR> Sorry to email you directly on this, but was
looking for a quick &<BR>correct answer. On the SRM WF's like SC & PO,
when you have WF Start<BR>Conditions defined & the User creates a SC or PO
that doesn't meet the<BR>conditions then they get the error message "No
Approval WF Found". My<BR>question is, is this how it's supposed to work or is
it a bug? And if<BR>it is std. then how does the User have the capability to
place the<BR>Order when not meeting the conditions & doesn't need an
Approval WF?<BR><BR>Thanx,<BR><BR>Jeffrey A.
Rappaport<BR>www.Business-Workflow.com<BR><BR>> Hi
Rick/Sherie,<BR>><BR>> Note 961466 changed the behaviour and no longer
allowed you to change<BR>> tasks via the builder.<BR>><BR>> Implement
note 1025255 to fix this.<BR>><BR>> Regards,<BR>>
Eddie<BR>><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From:
sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On<BR>Behalf<BR>>
Of Munday,Sherie J.<BR>> Sent: 10 May 10, 2007 14:48<BR>> To: SAP
Workflow Users' Group<BR>> Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from
4.6c<BR>><BR>> Rick,<BR>> I agree with your frustration on the
PFTC_CHG flipping to display.<BR>> Since our upgrade, we have had to get
used to opening the TS in a<BR>> separate window in the change mode and
then return to the parent....<BR>> Pain in the ... I would be most
interested to see if the other<BR>> wugger's are experiencing this same
pain.<BR>><BR>> We did not experience any missing elements when we
upgraded.<BR>> Best of Luck,<BR>> Sherie<BR>><BR>><BR>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On<BR>Behalf<BR>> Of Sample, Rick<BR>>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:25 AM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow Users'
Group<BR>> Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c<BR>><BR>>
No. I am referring to when the conversion finished the WF
Templates<BR>are<BR>> missing elements. And we are latest patch.<BR>> I
have added them to WF to get them working but wanted to know
what<BR>the<BR>> reason is so we can fix it before we
convert.<BR>><BR>> Also, for some reason when I add an element
PA0001-ENAME for example,<BR>to<BR>> the "ABAP Dict Reference" and save, it
changes itself to "ABAP Dict.<BR>> Data Type".<BR>><BR>> And, when I
am in PFTC_CHG and open a task of the WF it flips to<BR>> Display.<BR>>
No option to modify task in Change mode. Arrrggghhh!~ Very
annoying!<BR>><BR>> Rick<BR>><BR>><BR>> -----Original
Message-----<BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On<BR>Behalf<BR>> Of Munday,Sherie
J.<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:50 PM<BR>> To: SAP Workflow
Users' Group<BR>> Subject: RE: ECC 6 technical upgrade from
4.6c<BR>><BR>> Rick,<BR>> Were the missing container elements initial
values? If so, take a<BR>look<BR>> at OSS note 969389.<BR>>
Cheers,<BR>> Sherie<BR>><BR>> Sherie Munday<BR>> SAP Workflow
Developer/ Analyst<BR>> Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.<BR>><BR>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>> From: sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu
[mailto:sap-wug-bounces@mit.edu] On<BR>Behalf<BR>> Of Sample, Rick<BR>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:34 PM<BR>> To: sap-wug@mit.edu<BR>>
Subject: ECC 6 technical upgrade from 4.6c<BR>><BR>> We have in our
sandbox ECC 6. (A few of issues). Any pointers on any<BR>is<BR>>
appreciated!<BR>><BR>> 1.<BR>> I am missing WF containers elements
after conversion and can't find a<BR>> pattern.<BR>> Is there any
utilities to run to compare old / new?<BR>><BR>> 2.<BR>> Deadline
Monitor running but not picking up deadlines.<BR>> I had this up and
running last month. Now, it is "running" but my<BR>> deadlines are not
triggering.<BR>><BR>> Rick<BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing
list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing
list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>><BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing
list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing
list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>><BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> SAP-WUG mailing
list<BR>> SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR>><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG
mailing
list<BR>SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG
mailing
list<BR>SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR></FONT></TT><BR>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>SAP-WUG mailing
list<BR>SAP-WUG@mit.edu<BR>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>