SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 1

Sun Aug 5 14:57:30 EDT 2007

Hi,
could u please tell me the difference b/w parked invoice and invoice,i am
new to Wf.

Thanks &Regards,
Murali

On 8/1/07, sap-wug-request at mit.edu <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>         sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. "post" or "reject" parked invoice  (Priya Sharma)
>    2. Re: "ONLI" OK Code (IKhan)
>    3. RE: "post" or "reject" parked invoice  (Soady, Phil)
>    4. RE: "ONLI" OK Code (Morris, Eddie)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:48:22 +0530
> From: Priya Sharma <priya.sharma at tcs.com>
> Subject: "post" or "reject" parked invoice
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <OF66DCA522.60BB461B-ON6525732A.0021F2BE-6525732A.0022A412 at tcs.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi All,
> I am designing a WF for posting of parked invoices with BO - FIPP.
> At some approval level where 'X' person will post the parked Invoice , we
> want to give him the option of rejecting the document as well.
> If I am using tcode - FBV0 for post document , we have option for "post"
> but no option is provided for "reject".
> Please suggest how to go about it ??
>
> Best Regards
> Priya
> ____
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070801/1aa80af6/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:33:09 +0300
> From: IKhan <ikhansap at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: "ONLI" OK Code
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <fff808000707312333t4fdf3a90nd9f915df492730f4 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Leo,
>   The users may not have authorization for Tcode "*SWNWIEX*". Once you
> give
> this authorization your problem will be solved..
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> On 7/31/07, Leo Sopicki <lsopicki at ieua.org> wrote:
> >
> >  Hello Workflow List,
> >
> > My organization went live on SAP for the first time on July 2.  We're
> > using RSWUWFML2 to push notifications out to MS Outlook. Our tests of MM
> > workflow in our DEV/QAS environment worked as expected, but when we went
> > live users began getting a pop-up dialog displaying the "ONLI" OK
> Code.  It
> > seems that this occurs when a requisition with multiple potential
> approvers
> > has already been approved, and a subsequent attempt is made to connect
> to
> > it. (I'm not sure this is the only time it occurs.)
> >
> >
> >
> > I've seen the post regarding a similar problem by Jocelyn Dart when
> using
> > UWL on EP, but we are using SAPGUI.  (We're at support stack 7).  I
> couldn't
> > find any SAP Notes that addressed this specifically.
> >
> >
> >
> > Am I right on the cause of the error?  Is there a fix or a work around?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Leo Sopicki
> >
> > Senior Systems Administrator
> >
> > Inland Empire Utilities Agency
> >
> > 909-993-1657
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070801/64e40362/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:45:23 +0800
> From: "Soady, Phil" <phil.soady at sap.com>
> Subject: RE: "post" or "reject" parked invoice
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <5C22EB4C203D97468B4BB3B98DC2E73F94A69F at sgsine13.sin.sap.corp>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Rejected implies it sits there as parked document to me.
>
> What does reject mean to parked document?  Ask someone to fix it , ie
> route it to some for correction?
>
> Otherwise you can delete if you like.
>
>
>
> Potentially nothing to do outside of notify someone in case of reject.
>
>
>
> What should reject do ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Phil Soady
> Solution Architect
> Netweaver Consulting
> SAP Australia
> M  +61 412 213 079
> F  +61 2 9957 7263
> mailto:phil.soady at sap.com <mailto:phil.soady at sap.com>
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Priya Sharma
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2007 4:18 PM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: "post" or "reject" parked invoice
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
> I am designing a WF for posting of parked invoices with BO - FIPP.
> At some approval level where 'X' person will post the parked Invoice ,
> we want to give him the option of rejecting the document as well.
> If I am using tcode - FBV0 for post document , we have option for "post"
> but no option is provided for "reject".
> Please suggest how to go about it ??
>
> Best Regards
> Priya
> ____
>
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070801/95e03e3d/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:08:04 +0200
> From: "Morris, Eddie" <eddie.morris at sap.com>
> Subject: RE: "ONLI" OK Code
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <E8A49408428BC34DA7C4FADD5237FAA2074E8580 at dewdfe22.wdf.sap.corp>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> This issue could be caused due to your kernel patch level. See notes
> 765605 & 766971 .
>
> * 765605 - OK code dialog box using EASY ACCESS screen
> * 766971 - RSWUWFML2: Last SAP GUI session should not be closed
>
> You mention you are on support stack7 ...do you mean Basis 700 (NW04s).
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Eddie
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Leo Sopicki
> Sent: 31 July 31, 2007 16:18
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: "ONLI" OK Code
>
>
>
> Hello Workflow List,
>
> My organization went live on SAP for the first time on July 2.  We're
> using RSWUWFML2 to push notifications out to MS Outlook. Our tests of MM
> workflow in our DEV/QAS environment worked as expected, but when we went
> live users began getting a pop-up dialog displaying the "ONLI" OK Code.
> It seems that this occurs when a requisition with multiple potential
> approvers has already been approved, and a subsequent attempt is made to
> connect to it. (I'm not sure this is the only time it occurs.)
>
>
>
> I've seen the post regarding a similar problem by Jocelyn Dart when
> using UWL on EP, but we are using SAPGUI.  (We're at support stack 7).
> I couldn't find any SAP Notes that addressed this specifically.
>
>
>
> Am I right on the cause of the error?  Is there a fix or a work around?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Leo Sopicki
>
> Senior Systems Administrator
>
> Inland Empire Utilities Agency
>
> 909-993-1657
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070801/db6cabb0/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 1
> **************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20070806/4a926b4e/attachment.htm