How do you remove yourself from this distribution

[Susan R. Keohan]

Hi Sunni,

At the bottom of every message that Mailman distributes, there is a handy dandy URL.  It will take 
you to the SAP-WUG list info page, and from there, you should be able to navigate to the section 
where you can unsubscribe yourself.

If you try performing this yourself, and are unable to unsubscribe, then you can send mail to me 
(keohan at ll.mit.edu).

Cheers,
Sue

Sunni sunni wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Does anyone know how remove yourself from this distribution list.  I've sent 
> a couple of requests but still recieving replies.
> 
> Thanks..
> 
> 
> 
>>From: "Mike Pokraka" <asap at workflowconnections.com>
>>Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>>Subject: Re: Re-evaluate Rules via header event doesn't replace the WI
>>Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:39 +0100 (BST)
>>
>>Hi Mark,
>>
>>I've used header events, but not had a chance to use the rules one in
>>production, but it sounded like you answered your own question.
>>
>>The reserved question is debatable but I would agree with you that
>>reserved items should be included in the reevaluation. In most scenarios I
>>could think of a reevaluation would supercede a reservation (escalation by
>>deadline, changing data making someone else responsible... anything
>>else?).
>>
>>I'd see what OSS have to say on the matter.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>On Tue, September 26, 2006 11:35, Mark Pyc wrote:
>>
>>>No takers on this one? Does anybody productively use the header events
>>>with
>>>the 'Re-evaluate Rules of Active Work Items' option?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>On 9/19/06, Mark Pyc <mark.pyc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>G'day Wuggers,
>>>>
>>>>ECC 5.0
>>>>
>>>>We are using the Reevaluate Rules via version-dependant header events 
>>
>>to
>>
>>>>handle our deadline escallations however this process doesn't seem to
>>>>Replace the Workitem. This means that if a Workitem is reserved by an
>>>>agent,
>>>>they go off sick, the deadline kicks in, the table used in the agent
>>>>expression is appended, the event raised, the agents are recalculated
>>>>but
>>>>the Workitem remains reserved by the original agent. This is very
>>>>disappointing!
>>>>
>>>>Is this how it works (or rather doesn't) or do I have an OSS issue on 
>>
>>my
>>
>>>>hands (I can't find a suitable note).
>>>>
>>>>If this is how it works then I'm looking at extending the Worktiem
>>>>object
>>>>and including a method to call SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM which would 
>>
>>be
>>
>>>>included in the Deadline path before the event raise for recalc. I'd be
>>>>interested to know what others have done.
>>>>
>>>>Any insights greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>Have fun,
>>>>Mark
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>SAP-WUG mailing list
>>>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>SAP-WUG mailing list
>>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 

-- 
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
keohan at ll.mit.edu