How do you remove yourself from this distribution

[Sunni sunni]

Hi

Does anyone know how remove yourself from this distribution list.  I've sent 
a couple of requests but still recieving replies.

Thanks..


>From: "Mike Pokraka" <asap at workflowconnections.com>
>Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Subject: Re: Re-evaluate Rules via header event doesn't replace the WI
>Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:39 +0100 (BST)
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>I've used header events, but not had a chance to use the rules one in
>production, but it sounded like you answered your own question.
>
>The reserved question is debatable but I would agree with you that
>reserved items should be included in the reevaluation. In most scenarios I
>could think of a reevaluation would supercede a reservation (escalation by
>deadline, changing data making someone else responsible... anything
>else?).
>
>I'd see what OSS have to say on the matter.
>
>Cheers,
>Mike
>
>
>On Tue, September 26, 2006 11:35, Mark Pyc wrote:
> > No takers on this one? Does anybody productively use the header events
> > with
> > the 'Re-evaluate Rules of Active Work Items' option?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > On 9/19/06, Mark Pyc <mark.pyc at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> G'day Wuggers,
> >>
> >> ECC 5.0
> >>
> >> We are using the Reevaluate Rules via version-dependant header events 
>to
> >> handle our deadline escallations however this process doesn't seem to
> >> Replace the Workitem. This means that if a Workitem is reserved by an
> >> agent,
> >> they go off sick, the deadline kicks in, the table used in the agent
> >> expression is appended, the event raised, the agents are recalculated
> >> but
> >> the Workitem remains reserved by the original agent. This is very
> >> disappointing!
> >>
> >> Is this how it works (or rather doesn't) or do I have an OSS issue on 
>my
> >> hands (I can't find a suitable note).
> >>
> >> If this is how it works then I'm looking at extending the Worktiem
> >> object
> >> and including a method to call SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM which would 
>be
> >> included in the Deadline path before the event raise for recalc. I'd be
> >> interested to know what others have done.
> >>
> >> Any insights greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> Have fun,
> >> Mark
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug