Reciprocal of 168

[Kjetil Kilhavn]

I can't be certain, but I think you are out of luck, due to both of your
requirements, but especially due to the "continue if Chiefless" - unless
you are on a higher version (than 46c) with additional possibilities. We
have similar requirements here for hierarchy traversing, so custom
function modules are in use.
 
One tip from my past experience: check with your users what the
behaviour should be if the unit has a chief or reports to relationship,
but the position pointed to in that relationship does not have a holder
- is that considered a unit with or without a chief? Standard SAP would
be (if I have understood things right) to assume that it is a unit with
chief, but temporarily without a holder of the position. In other
companies (no names mentioned) that is considered a unit without chief
because it is common knowledge that large parts of the business don't
maintain the OM master data properly.
-- 
Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil OFT GBS BAS DEV SAP
 


________________________________

	From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]
On Behalf Of Mark Pyc
	Sent: 12. september 2006 17:51
	To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
	Subject: Re: Reciprocal of 168
	
	
	Thanks Mike. Yes it can be coded and Eval paths can form part of
the solution. The point my HR ABAPer was making was that it can't be
done with a single sexy Eval Path that could be plugged in simply to
RH_STRUC_GET. 
	 
	What I'm hoping to avoid is the having to code the logic for
Reports To vs Chief and the handling of Chiefless Org Units.
	 
	Have fun,
	Mark
	
	 
	On 9/12/06, Mike Nickson <mikenickson at gmail.com> wrote: 

		Mark
		 
		I agree with what they are saying that it can be done
with evaluation paths.
		 
		I have code for ascending an org structure based on
evaluation path parameters to find the org unit a user belongs to, but
if you passed it an appropriate evaluation path parameter then I think
it would also descend the org structure. 
		 
		I do not have access to an HR system at the moment to
check out what evaluation paths might be available, but could lay my
hands on it within a couple of days.
		 
		Regards
		
		 
		Mike
		 
		On 12/09/06, Mark Pyc < mark.pyc at gmail.com
<mailto:mark.pyc at gmail.com> > wrote: 

		
		G'day Wuggers,
		 
		No I don't mean 0.005952380952380952380952380952381.
		 
		I'm after a bit of code to determine the subordinates of
a user or position rather than the superior. So I'm looking for the flip
of 157/168/RH_ACT_GET_LEADING_POSITIONS.
		 
		My HR ABAPer assures me that this is too complicated to
be handled by an evaluation path and that there needs to a coded
solution. It should return all positions which would return the user in
question if plugged into 168. 
		 
		Does anyone have any treats? This is for a ECC 5.0 NW04
system. 
		 
		Thanks,
		
		Mark

		_______________________________________________
		SAP-WUG mailing list
		SAP-WUG at mit.edu
		http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
		
		
		


		 

		_______________________________________________
		SAP-WUG mailing list
		SAP-WUG at mit.edu 
		http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
		
		
		




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060913/18843ff6/attachment.htm