Error OL 826 when starting WF (Sue Keohan)
Shai Eyal
shaie at team.co.il
Fri Jan 6 14:46:45 EST 2006
Hi Tuan,
The problem indeed origin from database update - you wish to refer to
data which has yet been updated in the database. Using 'Wait' can aid,
but the best & safest way is to check table locking using 'ENQUE_XXX'
and 'DEQUE_XXX' function modules: you try to lock the record and than
you unlock it - if its successful, than the database update already
occurred and error OL 826 will not appear. Otherwise, wait 5 sconds and
try again until the lock & unlock is successful.
Good luck,
Shai E.
-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:39 PM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 14, Issue 10
Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
sap-wug at mit.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sap-wug-request at mit.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Error OL 826 when starting WF (Sue Keohan)
2. Germaine Michael/Southampton/GB/BATCo is out of the office.
(Germaine_Michael at bat.com)
3. RE: Setting workitem status to 'Completed' (Khanna, Manish)
4. Copy of WS1200151 not working (Maorriyan)
5. RE: Status management via transaction BSVW not triggering
event forsalesdelivery - post goods issue. (Brilleman,Hans )
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:58:17 -0500
From: Sue Keohan <keohan at ll.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Error OL 826 when starting WF
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <43BDB299.1090302 at ll.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Tuan,
Most likely is that the event is fired off before the actual database
update occurs. I know some folks have gotten around this by insert a
wait statement.
It's also useful to check the archives, as I think this issue has come
up before.
* <http://www.google.com>
> To search the archives of list questions and answers (also highly
> recommended!) please use the search criteria "Site:mailman.mit.edu
> sap-wug 'your term'" and visit * Google Search
> <http://www.google.com>*
*Regards,
Sue
Tuan Huynh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated:
>
> When starting the workflow by event when a notification is created
> (Business object BUS7051) for the object.
> Error OL826 (object does not exist) occurs in the workflow log. The
> notification is created from the Portal.
>
> Thanks,
> Tuan Huynh
> tuan.huynh at alcatel.com <mailto:tuan.huynh at alcatel.com>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:02:38 +0000
From: Germaine_Michael at bat.com
Subject: Germaine Michael/Southampton/GB/BATCo is out of the office.
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<OFF52E59FE.55A8B515-ON802570EE.0005BC2D-802570EE.0005BC2D at bat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I will be out of the office starting 06/01/2006 and will not return
until 09/01/2006.
_____________________________________________________________________
Confidentiality Notice: The information in this document and attachments
is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended only
for the use of the named recipient.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore British American
Tobacco does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and
then delete this document. Do not disclose the contents of this document
to any other person, nor take any copies.
Violation of this notice may be unlawful.
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:49:55 -0600
From: "Khanna, Manish" <manish.khanna at amd.com>
Subject: RE: Setting workitem status to 'Completed'
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<493F4B73971F3C4DA0FDBB28AFB68A42032E6CD5 at SAUSEXMB2.amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Ananth,
It seems these are background workitems.
In SWI1 for each workitem goto edit > workitem > execute background ...
(dont remember the text)
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Manish
________________________________
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Edwin Mukusha
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 12:37 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Setting workitem status to 'Completed'
Hi Anath,
I am not on ECC 5.0, we are running 4.7. But I believe that the set to
complete option will only work for workitems of a dialogue nature where
the 'confirm end of processing' has been set and some processing on that
workitem has been has happened. You will not be able to just simply
complete workitems when they are processing midstream or have yet to be
executed.
I think the best way to solve your problem is to investigate why each
workitem is in 'In Process'. For example:-
- are users receiving workitems that require then to physically complete
the workitem and they are not trained or are simply forgetting to do
this extra step after processing?
- do you have workitems that being generated in error are really not
supposed to be in existence?
- are these workitems really supposed to be completed?
- is there errors in the programming of the workflow where processes are
not competing?
It is good to hear you are trying to keep your workflow environment
clean and clear of superfluous workitems. The workflow manager will
work much faster with fewer outstanding items. One tip is to make sure
you are not generating workitems for users that maybe require one way
email notifications instead of workitem notification steps.
Lastly, if you really need to get rid of the workitems that are lying
around in production and have clearly established they have to go. You
probably can delete them logically in the workitem change screen (where
I am sure you know will keep a copy for your records). I am sure before
you do logically delete workitems you will notify the users that are
going to be affected, since I am not aware that you can reverse this
process.
bind away,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edwin Mukusha
Administrative Systems Group
University of Nebraska
Phone: (402) 472-7756 Fax: (402) 472-7390
Email: emukusha at nebraska.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Ananth <write2ananth at gmail.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
01/05/2006 12:24 AM
Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group"
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
cc:
Subject: Setting workitem status to 'Completed'
Hi All,
I am working on mySAP ECC 5.0 version.
I am faced with a situation where there are lots of workitems which
are in 'In Process' status. I want the workitem status to be set to
'Complete' status by using SWIA transaction.
I executed the SWIA transaction, selected the workitem and clicked on
'Complete Manually' button. But there has been no change in the status
at all, but in the history of that workitem, I see that the ' Workitem
replaced manually' being displayed, but no effect at all.
Can someone let me know how should I go about to change to status to
'Complete'.
Thanks in advance,
Ananth
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060106/3ae4f361/a
ttachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:48:44 +0000 (GMT)
From: Maorriyan <maorriyan_santoso at yahoo.com>
Subject: Copy of WS1200151 not working
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20060106084844.86676.qmail at web36701.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Good day all.
We're facing weird situation here.
We're copied standard workflow (WS1200151) for HR
Training and Event module. And we're not making any
major modification. We just changed the description.
When employee tried to book training by execute button
"Request attendance" from transaction PV7I, the system
saying "You have no authorization for the function or
the object".
We check the SU53 and nothing there. It's saying "All
authorization checks have so far been successful".
Then we deactivate our workflow and activate the SAP
standard and it's working.
Any body has answer for this?
Is this real authorization issue?
Is it probaly hardcoded in the HR application it self?
If is this the case, then how to modify it?
Thanks in advance
Maorriyan
Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:39:06 +0100
From: "Brilleman,Hans " <hans.brilleman at tntpost.com>
Subject: RE: Status management via transaction BSVW not triggering
event forsalesdelivery - post goods issue.
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
<C6DDC1D602478C49BB18F62C80E33A7A059D3EF5 at PRC59Q02.directory.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Anna,
thanks for the suggestions. I set up the status schema (SALES001) and
raised the event on the supertype, but for some or other reason it is
still ignoring the action on the post goods issue. Do you perhaps have
any more ideas?
Greetings,
Hans
________________________________
Van: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] Namens
Hill, Anna
Verzonden: donderdag 5 januari 2006 17:25
Aan: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Onderwerp: RE: Status management via transaction BSVW not triggering
event forsalesdelivery - post goods issue.
Hi Hans
I've not worked in this particular area before but you generally need a
status schema when you create the entry in BSVW. It's also best practice
to raise events on the supertype (i.e. LIKP) not the subtype (ZLIKP) -
as you have delegated your subtype then you should still see your custom
event against the supertype. If there is no status schema available then
check with your applications expert to ensure that the statuses have
been set up.
Hope this helps
Cheers
Anna
SAP UK
________________________________
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Brilleman,Hans
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:56 PM
To: Sap-Workflow user group
Subject: Status management via transaction BSVW not triggering event for
salesdelivery - post goods issue.
Hi all,
I am currently working on 4.7.
I created a sub type of LIKP and in there created a new event
POSTGOODSISSUED (sub type has been delegated).
With BSVW I created a entry with values as such:
Status OT = VBK
Business object = ZLIKP
Event = POSTGOODSISSUED
Status restriction = PSTD
For some or other reason it does not trigger the event when the post
goods issue button is executed. I have looked everywhere but cannot find
an solution to my problem. I have a way around it via a check function
module, but I want to know why it does not work via status management.
Any explanation will be highly appreciated.
Greetings,
Hans.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060106/02bc071c/a
ttachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 14, Issue 10
***************************************
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list