Making the actual agents the same as the possible agents

[Mike Pokraka]

Hi Adrian,

Spot on, and I second Mark's comment that this is not bad practice but
rather the whole design idea.
Static agents: Assign to task
Dynamic agents: Assign to WF step

(Though that's only a very rough guideline with many exceptions).

Cheers,
Mike
.... Tabasco close at hand.


> We are on 4.6C - and I think this is what I have done - I probably did not
> make it clear that I assigned the rôle in the task (i.e. display the task,
> go to agent assignment / maintain and then create a rôle attached to that
> task). This, however, only sets the possible agents, and as we are used to
> looking at the actual agents only, I would like to be able to make these
> actual agents at run time.
>
>
>
> It does seem from Mark's reply that this is not necessary - and I think we
> will ensure that our workflow people are made aware that this step does
> not have actual agents.
>
>
>
> Thank you Mark and Ramki for your replies
>
>
>
> With Best Wishes
>
>
>
> Adrian Clarke
>
> ABAP and Workflow
>
> Kimberly-Clark Europe
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of workflow99 at aol.com
> Sent: 08 August 2006 15:37
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: Re: Making the actual agents the same as the possible agents
>
>
>
> Hi Adrain,
>
> What release are you on? Can you not assign the  Role (AG)  to the step in
> the WF definition?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Ramki Maley.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aclarke at kcc.com
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Sent: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 6:39 AM
> Subject: Making the actual agents the same as the possible agents
>
> Dear All,
>
> We have a task that we need to go to all agents that have a particular SAP
> security rôle. By maintaining the agent assignment, we are able to make
> the
> possible agents equal to all agents who are assigned to the security rôle.
>
> Fine so far....and it works to a fashion, as if there are no actual agents
> it
> defaults to all the possible agents....however this is not good practice.
>
> But we can not work out how we can make the actual agents the same list as
> the
> possible agents. Am I missing a trick here?
>
> All help gladly received
>
> Adrian Clarke
> ABAP and Workflow
> Kimberly-Clark Europe
>
>
>
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
> contain
> privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from
> disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in error, please
> inform
> us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
> printed
> copy.   Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG%40mit.edu>
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> ________________________________
>
> size=2 width="100%" align=center>
>
> Check out AOL.com today
> <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom>
> . Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand.
> Always Free.
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may
> contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is
> exempt from disclosure under law.  If you have received this message in
> error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail
> and destroy any printed copy.   Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>