SRM 5.0 - Inactive versions of BOR Objects

[Kjetil Kilhavn]

Unfortunately I can't provide any other assistance than the comfort of knowing you are not quite alone. However, I have never observed it in the editor. I've seen it (many moons ago) only in the runtime version, where we could observe when debugging that execution took place on lines where the editor had no code. I think we were able to solve it by regenerating.

Probably not the same error, but probably related.

I've never user SE80 for business objects, didn't know I can!
However, here in good old 46C it just jumps to SWO1.
-- 
Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ØFT KTJ BAS DEV SAP
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at MIT.EDU 
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of Susan R. Keohan
> Sent: 5. april 2006 18:46
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: SRM 5.0 - Inactive versions of BOR Objects
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> SRM 5.0, SRM Server 5.50, SP SAPKIBKT03, Basis 7.0, SAPKB70006.
> I know, I usually come up with the whacked out questions on 
> Friday, so excuse me for posting such an oddball question so 
> early in the week.  And for the record, this is not a case of 
> EBKAC, I have watched while someone replicates this error.
> 
> Scenario:
> 1)  You have made changes to a function module interface that 
> a customer business object (say,
> ZBUS2201) calls, so you need to correct the errors. You edit 
> this business object. Save and generate the object.
> 2) From SE80, if you check Inactive Objects, ZBUS2201 shows up.  Why ?
> 3) From SE80, drill into the business object.  Generate the 
> Business Object.  It has an error (from the earlier code).  
> Select Goto>Next Error.
> 4) The code listed is not the code you edited and saved and 
> generated in Step 1.  Why ?
> 5) Hit the pencil to go into Change mode.  The live version 
> (created in Step 1) is now available for editing.
> 
> So I am assuming there is some hidden form of version 
> management going on  - that needs tweaking.
> Our Basis team cleared the buffers which brought no joy, and 
> then bounced the system, which also brought no joy.
> 
> Clearly I need to fill out an OSS message, but wanted to 
> check with my fellow WFers to see if any of you have also 
> encountered this issue.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sue
> 
> --
> Susan R. Keohan
> SAP Workflow Developer
> MIT Lincoln Laboratory
> 244 Wood Street
> LI-200
> Lexington, MA. 02420
> 781-981-3561
> keohan at ll.mit.edu


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.