Portal - UWL vs. SAP Business Workplace

Mark Pyc mark.pyc at gmail.com
Thu Sep 1 04:56:59 EDT 2005


G'day Sherman,
In my opinion the UWL is still incomplete. I saw the latest version atASUG in April and it's a vast improvement (not sure if it's releasedyet) but it's still lacking. No secondary methods, no advance withdialog and none of the maintenance you mention.
Stick with the workplace if you can at this stage.
My 2 p.
Have fun,Mark
On 8/31/05, Sherman Wright <swright at lsil.com> wrote:> > > Hi – > > We are using Portal 6.0, and because of unfamiliarity, etc., etc., we had> replaced the Universal Work List (UWL) with the SAP Business Workplace> (transaction SBWP) using Windows HTML GUI.  We have a handful of workflow> approval tasks (PR approvals, Fixed Asset retirement approvals, Absence> Request approvals, etc.) that we route to people in their Workflow Inboxes,> which should be available with either "tool".> > We are in the process of moving from SAP R/3 4.6B to MySAP ERP (ECC 5.0). > In light of this, I have been asked to provide pros and cons regarding> replacing the Business Workplace with the UWL, since the UWL is the default> tool in Portal.  Do any of you have any strong arguments either for or> against the use of UWL as opposed to the Business Workplace?  Some of our> users really like the ability to do their automatic forwarding, substitution> maintenance, outbox maintenance, etc., from Portal.  Most of these things> especially don't seem to be available in the UWL.> > Any information would be appreciated…> > Regards,> Sherman> >  > _______________________________________________> SAP-WUG mailing list> SAP-WUG at mit.edu> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug> > >


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list