- customizing

Srinivasan Ramanan r_m_n_n at hotmail.com
Thu Oct 27 13:17:10 EDT 2005


Thanks a lot folks....I really appreciate my SAP training faculty at SAP 
knowledge development center Atlanta for having introduced me to this user 
group..


>From: "Trant, David" <David.Trant at andrew.com>
>Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Subject: RE: - customizing
>Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:50:14 -0500
>
>You would not actually create copies of the same task in each system (in
>your example, TS9010001 turning into T9020001).  You would simply
>transport the task and it would retain its name in all systems.  The
>prefix simply shows where it came from and has nothing to do with the
>prefix of the system in which it now resides.  The only reason to keep
>separate prefixes in separate systems is to avoid conflict on that
>fateful day on which you must make a change directly in a target system.
>
>Let's say you used prefix 901 for all systems, and in development you
>had created several objects:  9010001, 9010002, 9010003, etc.  Now your
>development system keeps track of where you are in this progression via
>an index.  Let's say the index is currently sitting at 12, meaning the
>next object number to be assigned will be 9010012.  Now let's say you
>transported some, but not all of your objects to a target system.  In
>that system, the index sits at 1 and stays there because you're not
>developing anything there.  Let's say you transport the following:
>9010003, 9010004 and 9010005.  Now let's say there's an emergency and
>your development system is down and your boss approves making a fix
>directly in the target system -- a situation to generally be avoided at
>all costs, but it could happen.  Let's say your fix involves creating a
>new object.  Since the index sits at 1, that number assigned will be
>9010001.
>
>Now it's a few weeks later, and you've finally finished the development
>that included objects 9010001 and 9010002.  You transport them to your
>target system and what happens?  Your emergency fix gets wiped out when
>object 9010001 gets replaced by the newly transported version!  Had your
>target system used a different prefix, then the emergency object would
>have value, say, 9020001, and transporting 9010001 would have no effect.
>
>I know it's a long-winded explanation, but hopefully it clears things
>up.  Bottom line:  once you set all the prefixes, you can pretty much
>forget about them and all objects in all systems will typically be
>numbered with whatever prefix you choose for your development system,
>901 in this case.
>
>Good luck,
>David
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>Of Srinivasan Ramanan
>Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:18 AM
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Subject: RE: - customizing
>
>Hi  David,
>Thank you very much for your lucid explation of every points relevant
>for
>customizing...
>I infact used 901 for DEV system prefix...
>Perfix System DEv class
>901   S2E      YEWF
>
>After I transported to TST system which is in a different box,
>I got the tasks and workflow templates created with the sames prefix
>901...
>
>If I understood correctly , I should have configured perfix for DEV tTST
>and
>PRD systems and transported it like this
>
>901    S2E
>902    S2C
>903    F3C
>
>In this case do you mean that task TS9010001  developed in DEV system
>would
>have been created as task TS9020001 in TST system and as task TS9030001
>in
>PRD system...
>
>This is very much necessry becasue as you said in case of emergency
>direct
>maintenance development environment would not have the prefix number in
>PRD
>or TST system, if config is done only for DEV system ..
>
>AM I correct in my ubderstanding ?
>
>advance thanks for your confirmation on this.
>regards
>Srinivasan
>
>
>
> >From: "Trant, David" <David.Trant at andrew.com>
> >Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >Subject: RE: - customizing
> >Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:34:06 -0500
> >
> >I thought the customer namespace had to start with 9.  I recommend this
> >to avoid conflict with standard delivered workflow definitions.  Here,
>I
> >chose to assign a different prefix to each system, development, Q/A,
>and
> >production, on the outside chance someone had to go in someday on an
> >emergency basis and do something directly in a target system.  Also, by
> >having all prefixes defined in all systems, should your organization
> >refresh development or test systems periodically from production, you
> >automatically inherit the correct prefix without having to go back in
> >and change it.  The one additional step required during a refresh is to
> >reset the number range index.  This isn't strictly necessary since SAP
> >is smart enough to bypass numbers that are already in use, but it
>proved
> >less confusing for the overall community to preserve continuity.
> >
> >Attached is a document explaining our strategy in case you're
> >interested.
> >
> >Also, you should never use $TMP unless you truly have no intention of
> >ever transporting your development.  I seem to recall that there are
> >even some issues with truly local objects not always behaving nicely
> >without a proper development class assignment in 4.x systems (this
>turns
> >into 'package' in newer systems).
> >
> >Enjoy,
> >David
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
>Behalf
> >Of Srinivasan Ramanan
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:01 AM
> >To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> >Subject: RE: - customizing
> >
> >Thank you Keith....
> >
> >SRamanan
> >
> >
> > >From: "Gardiner, Keith (CIS)" <Keith.Gardiner at capita.co.uk>
> > >Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > >To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > >Subject: RE: - customizing
> > >Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:51:24 +0100
> > >
> > >Sorry having read your query again, I would go for B.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
> >Behalf
> > >Of Gardiner, Keith (CIS)
> > >Sent: 25 October 2005 14:48
> > >To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > >Subject: RE: - customizing
> > >
> > >You only need a prefix number where you are developing Workflows,
>tasks
> > >and rules. So you shouldn't require this to be set up in QA or Prod.
>If
> > >you are developing workflows on different dev clients then each will
> > >need a unique prefix number.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
> >Behalf
> > >Of Srinivasan Ramanan
> > >Sent: 25 October 2005 14:06
> > >To: SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > >Subject: - customizing
> > >
> > >Dear WUG,
> > >I need a recommendation for this :
> > >DEV system has a prefix number for standard object types as 201 set
>in
> > >customizing with $TMP as development class ..
> > >SAP recoomends that I should different prefix numbers in different
> > >sysems ...
> > >in SAP's words
> > >***************
> > >Recommendation
> > >
> > >Select a unique prefix number in your customer number range for each
> > >system and each client.
> > >***************
> > >What you advise ?...
> > >
> > >a. use 301 and 401 for TST and PRD systems with $TMP as development
> > >calss
> > >
> > >                  OR
> > >b. use 201 in DEV system and attache it to transportable development
> > >class and transport to other systems ?
> > >
> > >I am not really sure what is best case scenario...
> > >
> > >thanks for your help in advance
> > >
> > >regards
> > >SRamanan
> > >
> > >_________________________________________________________________
> > >FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
> > >http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >SAP-WUG mailing list
> > >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > >
> > >This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
>SkyScan
> > >service.
> > >
> >
> >***********************************************************************
> >*
> > >**********
> > >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and
>may
> > >be subject to legal privilege, and are intended solely for the use of
> > >the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> > >If you have received this email in error or think you may have done
>so,
> > >you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this
>message.
> > >Please notify the sender immediately and delete the original e-mail
> >from
> > >your system.
> > >
> > >Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. Recipients should
>check
> > >this e-mail for the presence of viruses. The Capita Group and its
> > >subsidiaries accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> > >transmitted by this e-mail.
> >
> >***********************************************************************
> >*
> > >***********
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >SAP-WUG mailing list
> > >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > >
> > >This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs
>SkyScan
> > >service.
> > >
> >
> >***********************************************************************
> >***********
> > >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and
>may
> >be
> > >subject to legal privilege, and are intended solely for the use of
>the
> > >individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> > >If you have received this email in error or think you may have done
>so,
> >you
> > >may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message.
> >Please
> > >notify the sender immediately and delete the original e-mail from
>your
> > >system.
> > >
> > >Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. Recipients should
>check
> >this
> > >e-mail for the presence of viruses. The Capita Group and its
> >subsidiaries
> > >accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by
> >this
> > >e-mail.
> >
> >***********************************************************************
> >************
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >SAP-WUG mailing list
> > >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
> >FREE!
> >http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >SAP-WUG mailing list
> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> >This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> >contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> >If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> >immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> >this email is prohibited.
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> >[mf2]
>
>
> ><< 01_WorkflowObjectNumberRangePrefixStrategy.doc >>
>
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >SAP-WUG mailing list
> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may
>contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
>this email is prohibited.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>[mf2]
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/



More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list