Reset the status of an event linkage after an error?

Peter Roehlen peter.roehlen at gmail.com
Fri May 13 07:44:45 EDT 2005


Hi Paul,
 We had something similar a few weeks ago in our production system. It took 
me a while to work out what was going on and I still haven't determined what 
caused the initial error. Anyway, to best of my recollection, I was able to 
set the linkage to 'No Errors' and then start delivery of the queued events 
all directly in production. It all went off without a hitch and it hasn't 
reoccurred since. It was the first time I've had to use transaction SWEQADM. 
Before that, my earlier experiences had resulted in my having to transport 
the event linkage up from development.
 Hope the above is of some use,
 Cheers - Peter Roehlen.

 On 5/13/05, Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au <
Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au> wrote: 
> 
> Dear WUG'ers,
> 
> Short version:
> 
> Is it possible to reset the status of an event linkage in PROD, without
> using a transport?
> If so, how?
> 
> ----
> 
> Long version (but the same question :-):
> 
> I have recently discovered the joys of using the Event Queue
> to capture workflow events in error.
> 
> I chose the setting "Mark linkages as having errors". This
> works very well - the linkage gets the status 'Errors' and the
> wayward events are saved in a queue.
> 
> The book / OSS say that if you choose this option, you
> must (after fixing an error),
> 
> "MANUALLY reset the status of the event linkage to 'No Errors'".
> 
> This is the bit I'm having problems with. Apparently
> you are supposed to do this by clicking the 'Linkage Status'
> column (in the 'Linkages with Errors' tab of SWEQADM). But
> when I try to do this, I get an error popup saying that it
> can't be reset. ("Status "no errors" cannot be set")
> 
> However, if I persevere and double-click anyway, it
> claims that it has reset the link! ("Linkage was set to "No Errors")
> But on checking SWE2, I can see that this is not true.
> 
> This is strange behaviour: I had understood from reading the WUG archives
> that only a transport would reset the linkage status.
> 
> Can anyone else share their experiences on this topic?
> I'm testing this out in a DEV client, and I want some
> kind of certainty on how it will behave in PROD.
> 
> thanks,
> Paul Bakker
> (Brisbane)
> 
> *************************************************
> 
> Only an individual or entity who is intended to be
> a recipient of this e-mail may access or use the
> information contained in this e-mail or any of its
> attachments. Opinions contained in this e-mail or
> any of its attachments do not necessarily reflect
> the opinions of Queensland Treasury.
> 
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachments
> are confidential and may be legally privileged and
> the subject of copyright. If you have received
> this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland
> Treasury immediately and erase all copies of the
> e-mail and the attachments. Queensland Treasury
> uses virus scanning software. However, it is not
> liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in
> any attachment.
> 
> **************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050513/ad94208a/attachment.htm


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list