SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF

lmillich@yahoo.com lmillich at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 15 08:05:25 EDT 2005


Hi Natasha and Miguel, 

Thanks for your help. I'll apply the mentioned notes
and speak the basis guys, our project is supported by
SAP Hungary on the basis side. Tommorrow I am again
with my client.  

Best Regards, 

Laszlo 

--- "Baunach, Natasha R" <natasha.r.baunach at intel.com>
wrote:

> Hi Miguel,
> 
> Yes, we are also waiting for end of month to apply
> support packs.  I
> just wanted to let Laszlo know to apply it since I
> saw a lot of notes
> related to BADI approval workflow that were included
> in SP 6.  I also
> found two more notes related to item-based approval
> workflow that would
> be included in SP 7.  They are 846334 and 847450.  I
> plan to apply those
> after support packs go in.
> 
> Regards,
> Natasha
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Adao-Cruz, Miguel
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:34 PM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF
> 
> 
> Hi Natasha,
> 
> Did you apply SP 6? Any problems?
> 
> I asked the basis people on our project about it and
> they said it is
> always
> a bit dangerous applying a support pack for one
> module and not applying
> the
> related support packs in the others modules (ABA,
> WAS, Kernel, etc.) as
> there might have dependencies (or are they too busy
> ;-). They told me
> that
> the support packs bundle (support stack) including
> SRM support pack 6
> will
> be available 26 June.
> So we preferred not to take the risk just for a
> couple of days but it is
> true that we are loosing a lot of time looking for
> and applying OSS
> notes.
> 
> Cheers
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> Miguel Adao-Cruz | Capgemini | Woking
> Technology Services
> T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927 |
> www.capgemini.com
> 
> 
> Join the Collaborative Business Experience
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of
> Baunach, Natasha R
> Sent: 12 June 2005 22:10
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF
> 
> Laszlo,
> 
> Try applying OSS note 783110 to solve your problem. 
> Also, you might
> want to consider applying support pack 6 -- there
> are a lot of OSS notes
> related to BADI approval workflow.
> 
> Regards,
> Natasha
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of lmillich at yahoo.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:10 AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF
> 
> Hi Miguel,
> 
> It was a programming problem with the approval
> obejcts. We have min. 1 - max. 7 approval levels
> dynamically depending on different things. Several
> levels depends on the same object (e.g. cost
> center),this caused the problem,  in this case my
> interpretation of approval object creation was
> wrong,
> the refresh is not needed.
> It works now fine, the only problem is, that if on
> the
> same level there are several approvers (e.g. for 2
> different cost centers 2 different approvers), then
> the approval preview works fine, the first approval
> is
> fine, but after one of the 2 approvers approved his
> item, then the work item for the second shop item
> appears not only for the second approver, but also
> for
> the first one. This is again weird.     
> 
> Have you seen any similar problem ?  
> 
> We are also on the SP5 level.
> 
> The whole BADI with the 3 tables seemed so simple,
> but
> I always face new problems and I did not started yet
> the workflow restart based on history tables.
> 
> Thanks for your comments and tips.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Laszlo
> --- "Adao-Cruz, Miguel"
> <miguel.adao-cruz at capgemini.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hello Lazlo,
> >
> > I will send you off-line (tomorrow morning, here
> it
> > is 21.30!) our OSS notes
> > list but don't forget to check if they are
> > applicable to your SP level. Some
> > notes referring to the approval preview applet
> could
> > maybe solve your
> > problem (Although I have the feeling it is a
> > programming error).
> > Maybe you are not aware but SAP provides 2 BADI
> > implementation examples,
> > only refresh item_approval_obj if SAP does it in
> his
> > examples (I don't think
> > it is the case).
> > There is an OSS note describing hints and tips on
> > developing the BADI (it is
> > worth to have more than just a look at it).
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> > Miguel Adao-Cruz | Capgemini | Woking
> > Technology Services
> > T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927 |
> > www.capgemini.com
> >
> >
> > Join the Collaborative Business Experience
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > lmillich at yahoo.com
> > Sent: 08 June 2005 20:31
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level
> WF
> >
> > Thanks Miguel.
> > Which notes did help? I did not find any specific
> > for
> > the double-ing probelm.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Laszlo
> >
> > --- "Adao-Cruz, Miguel"
> > <miguel.adao-cruz at capgemini.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello Laszlo,
> > >
> > > I had the same kind of bugs with EBP 5.0.
> > > Some of them were programming errors (not clear
> on
> 
=== message truncated ===



		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list