SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF

Mon Jun 13 16:03:03 EDT 2005

Hi Miguel,

Yes, we are also waiting for end of month to apply support packs.  I
just wanted to let Laszlo know to apply it since I saw a lot of notes
related to BADI approval workflow that were included in SP 6.  I also
found two more notes related to item-based approval workflow that would
be included in SP 7.  They are 846334 and 847450.  I plan to apply those
after support packs go in.

Regards,
Natasha

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Adao-Cruz, Miguel
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:34 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF

Hi Natasha,

Did you apply SP 6? Any problems?

I asked the basis people on our project about it and they said it is
always
a bit dangerous applying a support pack for one module and not applying
the
related support packs in the others modules (ABA, WAS, Kernel, etc.) as
there might have dependencies (or are they too busy ;-). They told me
that
the support packs bundle (support stack) including SRM support pack 6
will
be available 26 June.
So we preferred not to take the risk just for a couple of days but it is
true that we are loosing a lot of time looking for and applying OSS
notes.

Cheers

________________________________________________________________________
___
Miguel Adao-Cruz | Capgemini | Woking
Technology Services
T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927 | www.capgemini.com

Join the Collaborative Business Experience
________________________________________________________________________
___

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of
Baunach, Natasha R
Sent: 12 June 2005 22:10
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF

Laszlo,

Try applying OSS note 783110 to solve your problem.  Also, you might
want to consider applying support pack 6 -- there are a lot of OSS notes
related to BADI approval workflow.

Regards,
Natasha

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of lmillich at yahoo.com
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:10 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF

Hi Miguel,

It was a programming problem with the approval
obejcts. We have min. 1 - max. 7 approval levels
dynamically depending on different things. Several
levels depends on the same object (e.g. cost
center),this caused the problem,  in this case my
interpretation of approval object creation was wrong,
the refresh is not needed.
It works now fine, the only problem is, that if on the
same level there are several approvers (e.g. for 2
different cost centers 2 different approvers), then
the approval preview works fine, the first approval is
fine, but after one of the 2 approvers approved his
item, then the work item for the second shop item
appears not only for the second approver, but also for
the first one. This is again weird.     

Have you seen any similar problem ?  

We are also on the SP5 level.

The whole BADI with the 3 tables seemed so simple, but
I always face new problems and I did not started yet
the workflow restart based on history tables.

Thanks for your comments and tips.

Best Regards,

Laszlo
--- "Adao-Cruz, Miguel"
<miguel.adao-cruz at capgemini.com> wrote:

>
> Hello Lazlo,
>
> I will send you off-line (tomorrow morning, here it
> is 21.30!) our OSS notes
> list but don't forget to check if they are
> applicable to your SP level. Some
> notes referring to the approval preview applet could
> maybe solve your
> problem (Although I have the feeling it is a
> programming error).
> Maybe you are not aware but SAP provides 2 BADI
> implementation examples,
> only refresh item_approval_obj if SAP does it in his
> examples (I don't think
> it is the case).
> There is an OSS note describing hints and tips on
> developing the BADI (it is
> worth to have more than just a look at it).
>
> Cheers.
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
___
> Miguel Adao-Cruz | Capgemini | Woking
> Technology Services
> T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927 |
> www.capgemini.com
>
>
> Join the Collaborative Business Experience
>
________________________________________________________________________
___
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
> lmillich at yahoo.com
> Sent: 08 June 2005 20:31
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level WF
>
> Thanks Miguel.
> Which notes did help? I did not find any specific
> for
> the double-ing probelm.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Laszlo
>
> --- "Adao-Cruz, Miguel"
> <miguel.adao-cruz at capgemini.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello Laszlo,
> >
> > I had the same kind of bugs with EBP 5.0.
> > Some of them were programming errors (not clear on
> > how to handle the
> > approval objects) in the BADI and others were
> solved
> > with OSS notes.
> > There are lot of OSS notes out there for EBP 5.0,
> we
> > are in the middle of
> > the implementation phase with already more or less
> > 30 notes implemented (we
> > are at support pack 5)!
> >
> > Good luck.
> >
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
___
> > Miguel Adao-Cruz | Capgemini | Woking
> > Technology Services
> > T.+44-870-238-2927 | Int.700 2927 |
> > www.capgemini.com
> >
> >
> > Join the Collaborative Business Experience
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
___
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > lmillich at yahoo.com
> > Sent: 08 June 2005 08:22
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: RE: SRM 4.0 (EBP 5.0) n step item level
> WF
> >
> > Hi Jocelyn,
> >
> > I'll reported it to OSS, but I'm still not sure,
> > whether it is my programming error or an SAP
> > bug.I'll
> > check the notes again.
> > I wrote the letter late night, I forgot the put my
> > name.
> >
> > Thanks for your input.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Laszlo Millich
> >
> >
> > --- "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi no name,
> > > Please check your support pack level and check
> for
> > > any OSS notes about
> > > duplicate approver display - I know there are
> some
> > > for EBP 5.0.   If I
> > > were you I'd look at all the notes for the BADI
> > > approval workflows and
> > > make sure you have the lot (e.g. installed via
> > > snote).
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jocelyn Dart
> > > Senior Consultant
> > > SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
> > > Level 1/168 Walker St.
> > > North Sydney
> > > NSW, 2060
> > > Australia
> > > T   +61 412 390 267
> > > M   + 61 412 390 267
> > > E   jocelyn.dart at sap.com
> > > http://www.sap.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
************************************************************************
> > > *****************
> > > The information contained in or attached to this
> > > electronic transmission
> > > is confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It
> > is
> > > intended only for
> > > the person or entity to which it is addressed.
> If
> > > you are not the
> > > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> > any
> > > distribution,
> > > copying, review, retransmission, dissemination
> or
> > > other use of this
> > > electronic transmission or the information
> > contained
> > > in it is strictly
> > > prohibited. If you have received this electronic
> > > transmission in error,
> > > please immediately contact the sender to arrange
> > for
> > > the return of the
> > > original documents.
> > > Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to
> be
> > > secure and
> > > accordingly, the sender does not accept
> liability
> > > for any such data
> > > corruption, interception, unauthorized
> amendment,
> > > viruses, delays or the
> > > consequences thereof.
> > > Any views expressed in this electronic
> > transmission
> > > are those of the
> > > individual sender, except where the message
> states
> > > otherwise and the
> > > sender is authorized to state them to be the
> views
> > > of SAP AG or any of
> > > its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and
> > > their directors,
> > > officers and employees make no representation
> nor
> > > accept any liability
> > > for the accuracy or completeness of the views or
> > > information contained
> > > herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of
> any
> > > pricing information/
> > > business proposal herein is indicative only, is
> > > subject to change and
> > > shall not be construed as an offer or as
> > > constituting a binding
> > > agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its
> > > subsidiaries to enter into
> > > any relationship, unless otherwise expressly
> > stated.
> > >
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
copies of this message.

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug