Settings for SWWERRE - monitoring of work items with errors

[Michael Pokraka]

I don't see any issues. Depends on how long the business can wait for the most
critical item that may go into a temporary error. If you have a WF with a 2h
deadline after a background step which can go into temp error then you might
want to consider hiring another workflow administrator instead :-) 

I would see a high amount of these indicative of a possible process issue? Why
are they doing so when something else is happening? Training issue - tell them
to wait for their notification (add it into the WF if necessary)... blah blah
blah, you know what I'm getting at. 
Personally I prefer to keep it at the defaults, as sometimes you want errors to
happen so the WF admin becomes aware of any 'process issues'. 

Just my opinions, 
Cheers


--- Kjetil Kilhavn <kjetilk at statoil.com> wrote:

> It would be interesting to hear what settings others use/recommend for the
> monitoring/re-execution of background work items with errors.
> 
> We currently have 20 minute intervals and 3 retries, but recently there
> have been many cases of work items not executing so I am wondering if it
> would be wise to increase the number of retries and/or use a longer
> interval.
> --
> Kjetil Kilhavn
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
>