No subject

[Swami Bala]

Thanks Richard for the tip. I just recreated another object and delegated
it. But if I go for transport back from testing, Is it just enough to
transport only the object type ?
Swami Bala
 
 
 
 
 
>From: Richard Marut <rvmarut at earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:32:05 -0800
>X-Originating-IP: 192.73.60.25
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
>mc4-f27.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 15
>Jan 2003 15:35:38 -0800
>Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
><12.00894274 at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:33:11 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e)          with spool id 2537 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 15 Jan
>2003          18:32:53 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 3957; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:32:01 -0500
>Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122] by
>mitvma.mit.edu (IBM VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with ESMTP ; Wed, 15
>  Jan 2003 18:32:00 EST
>Received: from bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.78.244]) by
>pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id
>18Yx0w-00044A-00 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 15 Jan 2003
>15:32:06 -0800
>Received: (from nobody at localhost) by bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net
>(8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) id h0FNW5A29377 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed,
>   15 Jan 2003 15:32:05 -0800 (PST)
>X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net
>Approved-By:  rvmarut at EARTHLINK.NET
>Message-ID:
><Springmail.0994.1042673525.0.49191200 at webmail.pas.earthlink.net>
>Sender:       SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jan 2003 23:35:39.0257 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[CFB1CE90:01C2BCEE]
>
>Swami,
>
>You shouldn't have a problem if you delete it and re-create. The entry that
>goes into the request is R3TR SOBJ for the business object and R3TR PROG
>for
>the program entry. The methods are not listed so there should not be a
>problem. The end result should be that the object will be overwritten in
>the
>test client. You may need to go there and generate it manually.
>
>If it doesn't work, then delete the entire object, then transport back from
>testing.
>
>Richard Marut
>The Consulting Highway, Inc
>
>
>On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:09:40 -0800 Swami Bala <swam_in at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> > When I tried to change the Release status of
> > the Object type from 'To
> > Implemented' to 'To Released'.I accidentely
> > clicked on the 'To Obsolete'.
> > First time I felt SAP was merciless. It changed
> > the status
> > to 'Obsolete' with a message 'The object cannot
> > be changed again'.I was
> > shocked and good thing is this this is in
> > development client. Does any body
> > have any suggestions on how do I bring it back
> > to 'To released'
> > status ?. First of all I have transport
> > requests for this object and not
> > sure what would happen to them if I transport
> > them. My collegue here
> > suggested me to delete it and then transport it
> > back from Testing
> > client. Any implications ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Swami
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2
> > months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail