Responsibility maintenance in Prod?

[Menne de Jong]

One remark and one question:
1)
I noticed that when using transaction PFAC_DIS (4.6c) on pressing enter =
you
get all options.
 
2)=20
The container and type of a role are part of the workbench object role, =
 
whereas responsibilities are customizing within a role. Is the =
maintenace of
the role type and container not blocked on your productive system as =
opposed
to the responsibility?
 
Menne
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Vineet Mehta
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Sent: 8/19/2003 2:48 AM
Subject: Re: Responsibility maintenance in Prod?
 
Hi!=20
If I understand this correctly, you want a display mode for PFAC.=20
 
You can restrict the authorization to PFAC_DIS.=20
You should take PFAC_CHG, PFAC_CHG, PFAC_DEL, PFAC taken away from=20
authorization.=20
 
I hope this helps.=20
Cheers,=20
Vineet=20
 
 
 
 
 
        workflow at quirky.me.uk=20
        Sent by: Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
=09
        18/08/2003 09:37 AM=20
        Please respond to SAP-WUG=20
                =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=20
                =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 To: =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
                =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 cc: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=20
                =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Subject: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Responsibility =
maintenance in
Prod?
 
Greetings workflowers,
Question concerning responsibilities: Should they be maintained in a
production=20
environment?
In the past, I've come across two scenarios, based on the type of key
used to=20
determine responsibilities:
1. fairly constant data which can be maintained in DEV and transported
(e.g.=20
plant, country)
2. master data which doesn't necessarily exist in dev (e.g. customer).
PFAC was=20
opened in producton and the WF admin would maintain the
responsibilities.
=20
Now I have a high-maintenance situation on a 4.6c system where things
change=20
frequently and people outside of IT are to maintain the =
responsibilities
and=20
agent assignments. I notice PFAC has an all-or-nothing attitude, thus =
if
we=20
give someone access, they can maintain all workflow roles and even
change the=20
role/rule type. Is there any way to restrict this nicely - Ideally a
display=20
mode for PFAC with edit facilities for the individual responsibilities
would be=20
nice....
=20
Any thoughts and opiniions appreciated,
Cheers
Mike
=20