Terminating Workflows

[Michael Pokraka]

Hi,
This will result in a gradual performance loss, from users taking longer to load their inboxes, to overall table size increases as none of this will be archived.
You may only see the effects 6 months or a year or 2 down the line, but believe me it's worthwhile to sort this out now (I'm busy with a 'cleanup' operation at client, SWI2_DIAG for e.g. takes 3 minutes to run for this morning's errors!).
 
I would sugggest two approaches: a modelled deadline which quietly kills the item after a few weeks, or change the WI to a mail.
 
Cheers
Mike
 
 
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:21:44AM +1200, Richard Williams (FCF) wrote:
> Good morning all
> We have a workflow for PR Release, the requestor gets notified the his or
> her PR has been released.  To terminate the workflow the user has to execute
> the notification item, this does not always happen, which results in a
> number of WF's remaining in the In Progress state.  What effect, if any does
> this have on the system??
>
>
> Richard Williams
> Fletcher Challenge Forests
> SCG, Rotorua
> 07-349 5224
> 025 865 160