Background method error Access 'C' is not valid for verb type 'A'
David Weston
weston at clockwork.ca
Mon Nov 4 20:31:52 EST 2002
Hi folks
I have created a synchronous method to run as a background task in a =
workflow to=20
retrieve the result (position) of a workflow role resolution based on =
responsibilities and
am getting the following error:
Access 'C' is not valid for verb type 'A'.
If i use the restart workflow function in SWI2_DIAG the method completes =
correctly.
I have one import parameter for company code based on LFB1-BUKRS and an =
export parameter that
returns the position based on WFSYST-ACT_AGENT.
The method code looks as follows:
BEGIN_METHOD FINDMAILUSERSFORCC CHANGING CONTAINER. =20
data: bukrs type lfb1-bukrs. =20
data: actors like swhactor occurs 0 with header line. =20
data: positions like wfsyst-act_agent. =20
data: container1 like swcont occurs 0 with header line. =20
data: ad_appl type flag. =20
data: i77aw like t77aw occurs 0 with header line. =20
data: wegid type wegid. =20
data: results like swhactor occurs 0 with header line. =20
data: begin of actor_test occurs 0. =20
include structure swhactor. =20
data: short like objec-short, =20
stext like objec-stext, =20
end of actor_test. =20
data: user_tab like actor_test occurs 0 with header line. =20
=20
SWC_GET_ELEMENT CONTAINER 'CompanyCode' bukrs. =20
=20
refresh container1. =20
container1-element =3D 'COMPANYCODE'. =20
container1-tab_index =3D '000000'. =20
container1-elemlength =3D '004'. =20
container1-type =3D 'C'. =20
container1-value =3D bukrs. =20
call function 'RH_GET_ACTORS' =20
EXPORTING =20
act_object =3D 'AC98000012' =20
search_date =3D sy-datum =20
TABLES =20
actor_container =3D container1 =20
actor_tab =3D actors =20
EXCEPTIONS =20
others =3D 0. =20
=20
sort actors by otype objid. =20
delete adjacent duplicates from actors comparing otype objid. =20
read table actors index 1. =20
positions =3D actors. =20
swc_set_element CONTAINER 'Positions' positions. =20
END_METHOD.
Has anyone experienced anything like this before ? If so I'd appreciate
any feedback
Cheers
Dave =20
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list