SWW_CONT

[Kjetil Kilhavn]

If you require a two-step approval, and there is only an "last updated by" field
in the business object table, what do you do if someone asks you to find out who
approved a suspicious item? It probably isn't a good solution to not store
information about who approved with the business object, but I assume a scenario
like this could be in production one place or another.
 
Other than that I agree. When asked about what information would be lost (to
decide whether we would archive to tape or to the big archive) I likened it to
notes that are scribbled on envelopes when things go around via mail. This is in
our case valid for attachments which the user's create ad-hoc, to explain to the
receiver what they have done or what they want the receiver to do. And then I
asked the "ultimate" question: Did and do we archive envelopes for internal mail
in the case of paper-based things?
--
Kjetil Kilhavn
 
 
 
 
|--------+------------------------------>
|        |          Gregory Kowalik     |
|        |          <gkowalik at ashland.co|
|        |          m>                  |
|        |          Sent by: SAP        |
|        |          Workflow            |
|        |          <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM|
|        |          A.MIT.EDU>          |
|        |                              |
|        |                              |
|        |          18.07.2001 15:55    |
|        |          Please respond to   |
|        |          "SAP Workflow Users'|
|        |          Group"              |
|        |                              |
|--------+------------------------------>
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                            |
  |       To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU                                       |
  |       cc:     (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)                                        |
  |       Subject:     Re: SWW_CONT                                            |
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
 
 
 
I am with you Diane.
I am running deletion job in production everyday, since we don't need that
data.
I do not want to bother with creating files and then deleting them.
 
It's just general SAP's recommendation to archive.
 
Greg
 
 
 
 
 
 
"Nobles, Diane" <nobles_dh at naptheon.com>@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> on 07/18/2001
09:49:16 AM
 
Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
 
Sent by:  SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
 
 
To:   SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
cc:
Subject:  Re: SWW_CONT
 
 
Please answer that question for me.  If I do not need this data, why should
I archive?? Even in Production!!
 
Diane H. Nobles
SDE PM Team
(757)380-7250
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Blessed are those that hear the word
of the Lord and practice it. Luke 11:28
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Sahasranam [mailto:Rsahasranam at worldbank.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 9:45 AM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: SWW_CONT
 
 
The workitem and history deletion reports: RSWWWIDE  and RSWWHIDE
(transaction
SWUL) will delete container instances for selected workitems. You should
however
Archive and delete (transaction SARA), if possible.
 
 
 
                    Giesinger Marc
                    <Marc.Giesinger at egge        To:
Sap-Wug at Mitvma.Mit.Edu
                    r.com>                      cc:
                    Sent by: SAP                Subject:     SWW_CONT
                    Workflow
                    <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
                    A.MIT.EDU>
 
 
                    07/17/2001 09:02 AM
                    Please respond to
                    SAP Workflow Users'
                    Group
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hi Folks
 
a little question about transaction SWUF "watchdog for runtime tables"
 
at the point Containber Instance we have about 16.300.000 entries in our
produktiv system  ?!
so where can i delete this intance data ??? i know its the tbles SWW_CONT
...
 
thanks in advance
 
Marc
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Statoil: The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this
message.
Thank you.