AW: No negative values in role-responsibilities?

[Zinnecker, Albin, AZV]

Hi Jocelyn,
 
thanks for your response and sorry for not mentioning our release. =
We're on
4.6B!
 
I already tried using the minus sign behind the amount but I only got =
the
same result as before. It is even not possible to enter a negative =
value. I
debugged the program (SAPLRHUZ) and found that the two fields "amount =
from"
and "amount to" are character-fields. The conditional check (3000- GT =
3000)
returns FALSE, of course! I think this error doesn't exist on 4.6C =
anymore
(but I am interested in this ?!). I'll do an OSS-Call.
 
Thanks again for your support!
 
Regards,
 
Albin Zinnecker
a.zinnecker at gewkoelnag.de
 
 
> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:  Dart, Jocelyn [SMTP:jocelyn.dart at sap.com]
> Gesendet am:  Montag, 9. April 2001 05:19
> An:   SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Betreff:      Re: No negative values in role-responsibilities?
>=20
> Hi Albin,
> You don't mention what release you are on?
>=20
> I've tried defining a similar interval in a 4.6C system and it worked
> fine.
>=20
> Try entering the amount as 3000- to 3000, i.e. minus sign should be
> trailing not leading.
>=20
> Regards,
>         Jocelyn Dart
> Consultant (BBP, Ecommerce, Internet Transaction Server, Workflow)
> SAP Australia
> Email jocelyn.dart at sap.com <mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> Tel: +61 412 390 267
> Fax: +61 2 9935 4880
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zinnecker, Albin, AZV [mailto:A.Zinnecker at gewkoelnag.de]
> Sent: Monday, 26 March 2001 10:22 PM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: No negative values in role-responsibilities?
>=20
>=20
> Hi everybody,
>=20
> I have a problem with defining responsibilities in a standard role. I =
use
> just one parameter "amount" that refers to DDIC-field FKKCL-BETRH. =
This
> field also considers +/- signs but when I try to create an interval =
like
> "from: -3.000,00 to: 3.000,00" I get the message "amount from must be =
less
> than amount to". As you can see the from-amount is less than the =
to-amount
> but it's impossible to make the entries anyway.
>=20
> I think it's a tiny little problem but I have no idea at the moment. =
Who
> has
> realized a role defintion with negative values before or who has
> experienced
> a similar problem?
>=20
> Thanks in advance!!!
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Albin Zinnecker
> a.zinnecker at gewkoelnag.de