CATT Wizard

Susan R. Keohan skeohan at MIT.EDU
Tue Apr 11 08:46:19 EDT 2000


Forwarded to the list on behalf of Philip Kisloff (pkisloff at dc.com)...
 
>X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by ans2-pub.dttus.com
>Conversion: Allowed
>Priority: normal
>Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
>Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
>Date: 10 Apr 2000 12:05:41 -0500
>From: Philip Kisloff <pkisloff at dc.com>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: CATT Wizard
>
>This message was originally submitted by pkisloff at DC.COM to the SAP-WUG
>list at
>MITVMA.MIT.EDU. If you simply forward it back to the list, using a mail
>command
>that generates  "Resent-" fields (ask  your local  user support or
>consult the
>documentation of your mail program if in doubt), it will be distributed
>and the
>explanations you are now reading will be removed automatically. If on the
>other
>hand you  edit the contributions  you receive into a  digest, you will
>have to
>remove this  paragraph manually.  Finally, you  should be  able to
>contact the
>author  of this  message by  using  the normal  "reply" function  of your
>mail
>program.
>
>----------------- Message requiring your approval (25 lines)
>------------------
>
>     I was hoping of introducing the CATT wizard to workflow configurers
>     who do not have a developers key. The info I've seen suggests to me
>     it should be possible, and it seems it should be more than a way to
>     save coding a call transaction.
>
>     Using a Wizard, I've incorporated the CATT business object into a
>     standard task and this task into a workflow definition. There is
>     a similar SAP supplied standard task (TS3000742) which uses a
>     CATT procedure.
>
>     Both approaches want the CATT parameters to be read without
>     binding to the standard object method 'execute'. My task does not
>     work, as I expected, but I'm thinking that I might be missing
>     something.
>
>     If I need to redefine the method 'execute' in my own subtype,
>     and add the missing paramters to the method, developer rights
>     will still be required. Is this how its supposed to work?
>
>     Phil Kisloff
>     Deloitte Consulting
>     Oberwil-CH.
>
 


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list