1.8 goals... Met or not?
Ezra Peisach
epeisach at mit.edu
Sat Jan 2 08:29:17 EST 2010
Ezra Peisach wrote:
>
> With the release branch on Monday, I decided to look at the wiki page
> and see what was supposed to be there...
>
> a) Move towards test-driven development:
> This sort of was a failure - even though the wiki indicates that
> MITKC staff must provide testing scripts for every new feature.
> Looking at the various projects - not many: Some projects included
> testing - like the crypto modularity, and encryption performance.
> Notable "failures"
> i) Improved API for verifying and interrogating authorization data
> - examples on WIKI - but no tests written
> ii) Versatile crypto configuration - no tests that I can see w/
> DEFAULT enctypes or parsing code
> iii) Lockout for repeated login failures - no test code either
> iv) Services4User - test program exists - but not automated....
>
> b) Features claimed but not met:
> i) Disable DES by default - looking at the code in init_ctx.c - I
> believe the default is still for DES tickets...
> Someone could add the pid file for kadmind/kdc as an enhanced
> Administrator experience.
>
> Ezra
>
>
>
A correction - the versatile crypto configuration does have a test
program that is used. So (a)(ii) is wrong above - and I apologize.
Ezra
More information about the krbdev
mailing list