[ietf-enroll] Some thoughts on ENROLL's direction

[Max Pritikin]

It has been noted that if I'm going to reference TTI I should provide a
pointer to the draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pritikin-ttimodel-00.txt

	- max

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 14:59, Max Pritikin wrote:
> Excellent! I whole heartedly like where this email is going. Especially
> because it is very similar to the TTI model with only some minor
> variations. :)
> 
> In TTI the user is not the enrollee, instead they are enrolling a device
> or component such as their local machine, local hardware client, etc.
> The user is instead introducing the enrollee ('petitioner') to the
> enroller ('registrar'). 
> 
> I think the user vs enrollee distinction helps in clarifying the "role
> agreement" and "direction of the OOB information exchange" discussion.
> Additionally the recognition of this third element in the exchange
> provides a good starting point for discussions about 
> 
> 	- Max
> 
> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 10:47, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> > I think the two-view storyboard approach is a very good start. Do 
> > others here agree with this approach?
> > 
> > --Paul Hoffman, Director
> > --VPN Consortium
> > _______________________________________________
> > ietf-enroll mailing list
> > ietf-enroll at mit.edu
> > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/ietf-enroll
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-enroll mailing list
> ietf-enroll at mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/ietf-enroll