[Oww-Feedback] [OWW-SC] Changes to Feedback based upon "preliminary feedback"

[Jason Kelly]

> > For now I would suggest that everyone reply to the whole feedback list so
> that we know what has been responded to.

Yeah I agree, reply-to-all is a good way to handle it for now.  We can
think about a more complicated system if the number of feedback
comments start getting overwhelming.

thnaks,
jason

On Jan 20, 2008 12:53 PM, Bill F <bill.altmail at gmail.com> wrote:
> good suggestion. For now, the list server is saving them. we can refer to
> them indirectly if need be.
>
> B.
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 12:36 PM, Julius B. Lucks < julius at younglucks.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Bill,
> >
> >
> > Things seem to be working very well right now.  I would suggest that we
> eventually put these emails in some sort of queueing system so that we can
> manage which emails have been answered, and which users to send an email
> back to when a feature has changed that they were interested in - could
> eventum handle this?
> >
> >
> > For now I would suggest that everyone reply to the whole feedback list so
> that we know what has been responded to.  I forgot to do this for the 1st
> one, but I will do for the second one.  I'll also write an SC blog post
> today.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Julius
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Please Reply to My Permanent Address: julius at younglucks.com
> > http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/User:Julius_B._Lucks
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2008, at 6:25 AM, Bill F wrote:
> >
> > Julius,
> >
> > We're using the MIT Mailman mailing list manager. I checked and there's no
> way to do this for email addresses in the text of messages. We can hide all
> addresses appearing in the headers of messages. I haven't tried it to see
> the effect but I don't know whether this simply hides the text or makes
> messages not eligible for replies. I'll look at it during the week.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > B.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 19, 2008 12:53 PM, Julius B. Lucks <julius at younglucks.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Great!
> > >
> > >
> > > Can we automatically remove the email addresses from tge text of the
> archived messages? Just to be safe.
> > >
> > >
> > > Julius
> > >
> > > Please Reply to julius at younglucks.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 19, 2008, at 7:42 AM, "Bill F" < bill.altmail at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I've made a few changes to the way feedback messages are handled to
> tighten up the accepting and distribution of those messages.
> > >
> > > 1. The System:Contact special page is pretty cool. Feedback is collected
> from the "feedback form" and delivered to an unpublished email address. We
> can accept any feedback via the website and handle it as we need to.
> > >
> > > 2. I have created a new email alias on OpenWetWare.org to serve as the
> destination for the feedback messages. This address is a random sequence and
> will not generally be published.
> > >
> > > 3. I removed the "feedback" alias from OpenWetWare.org. All messages to
> be routed to the Oww-Feedback.mit.edu mailing list will go to the new mail
> address.
> > >
> > > 4. If people find and abuse the " oww-feedback at mit.edu" address badly,
> we'll fall back the same way by renaming the list or replacing it with an
> app within OWW or via another web application.
> > >
> > > 5. In any discussion of feedback within OWW, please refrain from writing
> actual email addresses. This will keep the robots from finding and spamming
> the list.
> > >
> > > 6. Anyone on the current OWW-Feedback list will notice no difference in
> its behavior. The random email address I mentioned is part of the "feedback
> application" and wasn't intended as an alternate way of submitting feedback.
> > >
> > > 7. I am adding a new MediaWiki: system message,
> "MediaWiki:FeedbackHeaderContent". The contents of this message will be
> displayed on the form. I'll let people know when it's available.
> > >
> > > Let's see how this works. We can use it for other processes which
> involve taking input from non-OWW members in a controlled manner as they
> emerge.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List
> > > sc at openwetware.org
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenWetWare Steering Committee Mailing List
> sc at openwetware.org
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-sc
>
>