[Tango-L] Improving Discussion - Clarification of terms
David
dchester at charter.net
Thu Feb 12 14:34:10 EST 2009
Brian,
That is an interesting way of describing it. But for me, I'd call the mysterious signaling medium, "vision". Also, if I was in open embrace, (and especially if the follower had her eyes closed), I'd say the signaling medium was my hands or arms. It makes it a little less mysterious for me, rather than thinking of this nebulous thing called "connection".
Regards,
David
------------------------------------------------
> From: "Brian Dunn" <brian at danceoftheheart.com>
> Subject: Re: [Tango-L] Improving Discussion - Clarification of terms
>
> . . .
>
> Clarification: LEAD
>
> Is it possible to "lead" a follower without touching them? I hope we agree it is
> possible, at least in principle, because everyone in our classes does it in the
> first five minutes of their first class ;).
>
>
> Clarification: CONNECTION
>
> Chicho says (about his lead), "No arms, just connection"...
>
> If it is possible to lead one's partner without touching them (see above), then
> I suppose we could call the mysterious signaling medium that makes this
> communication possible "connection". Perhaps this is what Chicho refers to
> here. But apparently this would not need to be a "physical" connection for the
> lead/follow signal to be received and understood - as, again, our beginner
> students discover in the first five minutes.
More information about the Tango-L
mailing list