[Tango-L] how to lead (was 'weight change')

[Crrtango@aol.com]

Alexei wrote:

<<<I *said* that I acknowledged the fact that I was in violent agreement
with the gist of most comments but didn't define a frame to be locked in the
same way, and now I'm continually dragged back into the fray by
people who insist on reading my words using a definition that I have
*SAID* isn't mine.>>>

<<<Close embrace != locked in my dictionary (I prefer the term "joined").
If it is in yours, then there's no need to read *my* statements through
your glasses and disagree, because I'd disagree with them too, when read
in this way.>>>


That is something of an arrogant stance to assume that you are using language 
correctly and everyone else is misinterpreting it.   Your choice of words 
leaves many things open to interpretation. Nobody is dragging you into the fray. 
We are only questioning what you mean, which is not very clear. A simple 
clarification without the condescension will suffice. 

Cheers,
Charles







**************
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at AOL Autos.
      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)