[Tango-L] Comparison of Teachers [was 'forgery' blah, blah, blah]

[Keith]

Chris,

The subject of my email was Gustavo Naveira, not Carlos Gavito, which is
why I didn't mention your views on Gavito. But it's nice to know that you 
gave the maestro a 'pass mark' following your study and evaluation of more 
than 60 different teachers. 

That study must have taken a lot of time and effort, Chris, so why don't you 
share more of your results with Tango-L. I mean, all we know is that you gave 
Naveira a 'fail' and Gavito a 'pass', but what about the other 58 teachers? 
Please enlighten us; I'm sure your insights would make interesting reading. 

Keith, HK


On Wed Mar 28  9:10 , "Chris, UK"  sent:

>Keith keith at tangohk.com> wrote:
>
>> I wasn't refering to Chris' recent message, but his email dated 2
>> October 2006 and reprinted below.
>
>Actually what you 'reprinted' is not my email of 2 October 2006, but a 
>forgery made up of lines copied and changed from the original archived at 
>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/tango-l/2006-October/002083.html .
>
>In particular I did not write:
>
> Here is an example from a study I made 
>
>but
>
> Here is an example each way from a study I made 
>
>the second of which was an account of Gavito's excellent teaching. Which 
>you removed. Along with every other comment I made about good teaching. 
>
>> Chris hates teachers in general
>
>No he does not.
>
>Chris