[Tango-L] Direction: Theorem #1
Jay Rabe
jayrabe at hotmail.com
Mon Nov 27 22:46:11 EST 2006
Jake, regarding your comment: "I'm asking if we can find something with More
worth [than open-cross step definitions.] So how will you know when it has
more worth? What do you value? What do you want to DO with the
definitions/analysis?
For example, while it is curious to me and can be entertaining in a
left-brain sort of way to debate various definitions of when a step is open
or crossed or neither, what's the point? I'd love for someone to give me an
example of how it can be helpful in learning, teaching, or dancing (which
are the things I value) to know whether a given step is "open" or "crossed."
If the whole point is to use words to describe a step or sequence of steps
(ie without doing a demonstration or drawing a picture), and you might want
to say something like, "leader takes a right forward open step," then the
real measure of worth IMO is whether that description is superior in any way
to a definition based on for example Jeff Gaynor's proposal, which might
describe the same step by saying, "leader takes a right step to 12:00." My
personal opinion: it is not. I find Jeff's system completely adequate and
unambiguous.
In addition, I really liked Jeff's analysis of possible ways of stepping,
and the need to describe the differences between pivoting on one foot vs.
twisting on two, and between stepping by lifting-placing vs. sliding the
foot. I'd struggled with that too, and his is the first time I've seen it
addressed (Thanks, Jeff).
J
www.TangoMoments.com
_________________________________________________________________
Get free, personalized commercial-free online radio with MSN Radio powered
by Pandora http://radio.msn.com/?icid=T002MSN03A07001
More information about the Tango-L
mailing list