[Tango-L] Always close embrace I
Derik Rawson
rawsonweb at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 30 16:26:10 EDT 2006
Dear Sergio:
Thank you for the summary. I agree with you
completely. Excellent!
Derik
d.rawson at rawsonweb.com
--- Sergio Vandekier <sergiovandekier990 at hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Derik says:
>
> "The problem I have with the "close embrace all the
> time" people is ignorance, and then them trying to
> spread that ignorance around, by promoting their own
> inexperienced teachers. If the "close embrace all
> the
> time people" would just dance the way they want to
> and
> leave other people alone (not try to teach their
> ignorance), then I would have no problem with them
> at
> all."
>
> I think we should analyze the reasons a particular
> individual chooses to
> dance in a particular way.
>
> 1 - The style of the local available instructor.
> Here we should
> acknowledge the existence of several periods:
>
> An initial period (early nineties):
>
> Most instructors traveling abroad taught open
> embrace salon style (called
> tango fantasia by some people, nowadays).
>
> This style could be very demanding in the way of
> physical conditioning,
> dancing skills and availability of space to dance,
> (it trains for stage
> dancing although it can be done as a social form)
> but it can be simplified
> to some extent to adjust to different circumstances.
>
> The students at this period (ignorant of the
> existence of different tango
> styles assumed that that was the only Argentine
> Tango).
>
> A few years later ( mid nineties):
>
> People started to travel to Argentina to improve
> their dancing and
> discovered that most people at the milongas danced
> in close embrace. A
> different form of the one they had been taught.
>
> This form was more compact, kept the close embrace
> all the time except for
> minor adjustments and the best of all: it was
> excellent for dancing in
> crowded milongas and at the same time it was not as
> demanding of physical
> conditioning, skills and rigorous training as the
> other form. It was ideal
> for social dancing done by people of all ages and
> physical aptitude.
>
> These people returned home believing that they had
> been cheated and
> proclaimed that the "real tango was done in close
> embrace". At the same
> time instructors of this style started to travel
> abroad saying " if you wish
> to dance in buenos Aires, you should learn this
> style, because most people
> there dance this form. They were not lying, this was
> the truth.
>
> They said "most" people dance only in close embrace.
> They neglected to
> mention that many others danced 'Salon open embrace'
> , that many danced both
> ways open and close embrace, and that a few were
> starting to dance "Nuevo
> tango" and "Canyengue".
>
> During this period many people started instruction
> in 'milonguero, close
> embrace'.
> That was all they knew, they were convinced this was
> the only tango that
> existed. Many other dancers frustrated with their
> impossibility to master
> the 'Tango Fantasia' joined in. They had plenty of
> room to dance but they
> chose to make the room smaller to reproduce the
> situation in Buenos Aires.
>
> When dancing with beginners of "open embrace"
> started to complain about
> them: "they show off",
> "they dance externally (for the audience) rather
> than internally the way we
> do it", "they are rude, as they provoke frequent
> collisions", etc. The
> dancers of only 'Open embrace rarely complained
> about the others but
> interiorly many of them thought that close embrace
> seemed to be an
> "inferior" form of dancing tango.
>
> During this period Nuevo Tango was introduced by
> traveling instructors of
> this style.
>
> Here again we have a style that is very demanding
> in the way of physical
> aptitude, skills and training.
> Due to all those factors this style atracted mostly
> young dancers.
>
> Will continue, Best regards, Sergio.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN
> Search!
>
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
> > _______________________________________________
> Tango-L mailing list
> Tango-L at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/tango-l
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Tango-L
mailing list