Setting WFLOW ROLE in table T77S0

[Dart, Jocelyn]

And that is why the SWI1_RULE transaction was created .,., so you could find workitems without agent, diagnose the problem, and reassign them with minimal delay

So that transaction should be on your at least daily wf admin checklist
Rgds
J

Sent from my iPhone with many apologies for the spelling, grammar and any other deficiencies

On 14 Nov 2013, at 7:49 am, "Rick Bakker" <rbakker at gmail.com<mailto:rbakker at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Claus,

"Terminate if rule resolution without result" will only result in an error if no agent is returned, but you said it does return an agent. It would be the same if a rule returned an excluded user - the step wouldn't go into error but it also wouldn't go to any agent.

regards
Rick



On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Claus Lücking <wug at lucking.dk<mailto:wug at lucking.dk>> wrote:
Hi,

I have read about this ‘X’ in “the book” and also in some old emails in this list.

I’m currently testing the behavior of the entry WFLOW.ROLE in table T77S0 and this is not working as expected. Maybe I misunderstand the meaning.

I have a rule in my workflow step for finding agents – and this rule finds a user but the user does not have the authorization role used for setting possible agents in the standard task.
Rule has flag set for “Terminate if rule resolution without result” and entry in T77S0 is ‘X’.

Now I would have expected the workflow going into error – but it just creates a work item without agent.

SAP_BASIS 702 SP11.

Regards,
Claus.

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131113/6aea89e7/attachment.htm