BUS2009 BANF missing item number

[Halladay, Liz (Calgary)]

Mark,

Thank you for the quick response.  Your solution worked very well.  Thank you again for your help.  

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 10:28 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 109, Issue 15

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
	sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: BUS2009 BANF missing item number (Halladay, Liz
      (Calgary)) (Mark Pyc)
   2. Re: Duplicate Workflows Being Triggered from Single Event
      (Kjetil Kilhavn)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:56:58 +1100
From: Mark Pyc <mark.pyc at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUS2009 BANF missing item number (Halladay, Liz
	(Calgary))
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
	<CA+795SCK9J+nOJec_ROxa-1bYSW2XtRekBH3PZKY38f3L2i01A at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

G'day Liz,

Hopefully someone has a better answer for you, because the solution that pops to mind is a little messy.

You may need an event on BUS2105 (called ITEM BLOCKED) and then you pass the Change Doc number as a parameter.
You then need a custom Receiver Function Module that you include into SWETYPV which will read that Change Doc and raise as many BUS2009 events as you need.

Fingers crossed someone has a more elegant solution for you....

Have fun,
Mark




On 11 December 2013 07:50, Halladay, Liz (Calgary) < Liz_Halladay at nexeninc.com> wrote:

> Is there a way that I can raise an event for each line item that gets 
> blocked?  It appears that because only one change document is getting 
> written, only one event is getting raised.  If I block 3 items on a  
> purchase req.  I want 3 separate "blocked" events to get raised.  
> Right now I'm only getting one.
>
>
> ************************************************************
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or 
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
> privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under 
> applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or 
> distribution of this message is prohibited and that taking any action 
> in reliance on the content of this message is to be avoided.
> Should you receive this
> e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or 
> call (403)
> 699-4000
> and delete this message from your system. Thank you.
>
> ************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20131211/d8471c78/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:50:34 +0100
From: Kjetil Kilhavn <list.sap-wug at vettug.no>
Subject: Re: Duplicate Workflows Being Triggered from Single Event
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <12962281.GmkqcWs70c at t410-kjetil.vettug.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Tirsdag 10. desember 2013 11.26.29 skrev Bratzler, Loren:
> I am not familiar with SM58 (and do not have access to it in production). 
> When you say "this was executed by someone", does that imply that 
> there is a function in SM58 that will allow us to manually reprocess a 
> failed RFC call?

Yes, that is possible, and it is sometimes (depends on the
circumstances/solution) the correct action.

> Also, thank you for the information on the event queue background job.  
> That was a mystery that was puzzling myself and our Basis team!

You (and they) are welcome.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn / Vettug AS (http://www.vettug.no)


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 109, Issue 15
****************************************

************************************************************ 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying, 
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is prohibited and that taking 
any action in reliance on the content of this message is to be avoided. Should you receive this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call (403) 699-4000 
and delete this message from your system. Thank you. 

************************************************************