Condition Editor is failing to save the condition.

Thu Mar 22 14:41:34 EDT 2012

Condition Editor is failing to save condition in Basic Data.  We are on ecc701.
Anyone having issues with this.

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 1:35 PM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 88, Issue 34

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
	sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution (Stephens, Monique S L)
   2. RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution (Baba Jammi)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:32:31 -0500
From: "Stephens, Monique S L" <moniques at bcm.edu>
Subject: RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution
To: "'SAP Workflow Users' Group'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
	<BD844841E948BD4293994F85BD77A1CCA5C668C818 at EXCMSMBX01.ad.bcm.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Normally with workflow substitution, the documents will still route to A and B can pick them up.  If you look at the documents themselves, can you see whose inbox they are actually in?

Monique Stephens

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Baba Jammi
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:30 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution

Thanks Stephen.

Its user B substitues for A.

So, after date expiration, A should see all the workitems which were delivered to B during the substituion period. This is not happening.

Thanks,
Baba

--- On Thu, 3/22/12, Stephens, Monique S L <moniques at bcm.edu<mailto:moniques at bcm.edu>> wrote:

From: Stephens, Monique S L <moniques at bcm.edu<mailto:moniques at bcm.edu>>
Subject: RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution
To: "'SAP Workflow Users' Group'" <sap-wug at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug at mit.edu>>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 8:48 AM

If user A is the substitute as your first sentence implies, then it would not remain in A?s inbox after the expiration date.

However, your statements below are confusing because first you have A as the substitute, then B.

Monique Stephens

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu<mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Baba Jammi
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:41 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: SAP Wokflow Substitution

Not sure if this is how workflow substition works or I am missing something. Please advise.

User A substitutes for B for period 03/22 thru 03/25.

On 03/23 workflow finds agent A as approver for a task and delivers task to agent B as he is substitute.

Agent B, takes NO action on the task.

On 03/25, workflow substitution exprires.

On 03/26, task still appearing in Agent B's inbox whereas I was expecting it to appear in agent A's inbox as substitution expired.

Thank you,
Baba

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu<http://us.mc1117.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=SAP-WUG@mit.edu>
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20120322/b624bd3f/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Baba Jammi <jmc_sap at yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at MIT.EDU>
Message-ID:
	<1332437668.73093.YahooMailClassic at web111718.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Yes, even I expected the same. But it's not the case. When I see in the log, tasks are only delivered to B, not to A. 
?
Thanks,
Baba

--- On Thu, 3/22/12, Stephens, Monique S L <moniques at bcm.edu> wrote:

From: Stephens, Monique S L <moniques at bcm.edu>
Subject: RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution
To: "'SAP Workflow Users' Group'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012, 11:32 AM

Normally with workflow substitution, the documents will still route to A and B can pick them up.? If you look at the documents themselves, can you see whose inbox they are actually in?
?
?
Monique Stephens
?

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Baba Jammi
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:30 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: SAP Wokflow Substitution
?