SAP Wokflow Substitution

[Baba Jammi]

Thanks Khetil for bringing this up. Never noticed.

Regards.
Baba

On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Kjetil Kilhavn <kjetil.kilhavn at bluec.no> wrote:

> Please do NOT reply to a messaget to SAP-WUG when you want to ask a new 
> question. Create a new message from scratch instead.
> 
> Those of use fortunate enough to not use Outlook or another e-mail client 
> without proper threaded message list support have good reason to get irritated 
> by such netiquette breach (thread hijacking). 
> 
> Here I am, following a thread on SENDTASKDESCRIPTION problems when all of a 
> sudden there's more than 10 messages on a completely different subject (that's 
> your subject Baba Jammi) inside the thread.
> 
> If you don't know what thread hijacking is you can Google it (in the days when 
> UseNet was more popular is was more well-known) - or just consider what just 
> happened to this thread of discussion started by Vijayendra Rao on problems 
> with SENDTASKDESCRIPTION.
> 
> 
> Torsdag 22. mars 2012 06.40.40 skrev Baba Jammi:
>> Not sure if this is how workflow substition works or I am missing something.
>> Please advise. 
>> User A substitutes for B for period 03/22 thru 03/25.
>> 
>> On 03/23 workflow finds agent A as approver for a task and delivers task to
>> agent B as he is substitute. 
>> Agent B, takes NO action on the task.
>> 
>> On 03/25, workflow substitution exprires.
>> 
>> On 03/26, task still appearing in Agent B's inbox whereas I was expecting it
>> to appear in agent A's inbox as substitution expired.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Baba
> -- 
> Kjetil Kilhavn (+47 40220607) - Blue Consulting AS (http://www.bluec.no)