Extended notifications scheduling

[Rick Bakker]

Hello,

I am not sure about "Delete After Send" but I think it makes
RSWNNOTIFDEL unnecessary.
I would try it without RSWNNOTIFDEL; you can always start it up later
(check table SWN_NOTIF for growth).

As for the scheduling, I normally would do 30/30/15. Option 2
(10/10/5) seems like overkill to me and may even be pointless in a
heavy-use environment. Option 1 (5/5/5) would be running constantly.

You can, of course, try Option 1 and see how it goes.

regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ibrahim <ikhansap at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear User,
>   I am configuring Extended notifications for sending the workflow
> notification to Outlook. I have a question on scheduling part. My Client
> wants the notification in outlook as soon as PR/PO is created in SAP. Let me
> know out of the below two options which one would be the best to send the
> notifications at the earliest. Also let me know if there is any performance
> issue if select the option 1.
>
> Note : I have checked/selected the option ‘No Time Check During Send’ in the
> selection screen of the report SWN_SELSEN and defined as a variant for my
> background job.
>
>
> OPTION 1:
> Schedule Selection Interval = 5 minutes
> Delivery Schedule Interval = 5 minutes
> Background Job Schedule = 5 minutes
>
> OPTION 2:
> Schedule Selection Interval = 10 minutes
> Delivery Schedule Interval = 10 minutes
> Background Job Schedule = 5 minutes
>
> Also I have one more doubt, while configuring the extended
> notifications(SWNCONFIG) do we need to select the option "Delete After Send"
> under the option "CATEGORY".
> Is it the same as scheduling the background job RSWNNOTIFDEL for Deleting
> Completed Notifications or these two things are different. Please advise.
>
> Regards
> Ikhan
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>